You are here: Welcome » Christine Massey - FOI

Christine Massey - FOI

Christine Anne Massey

Official Government of Canada Bio

Christine Massey - Deputy Minister, BC Ministry of Mental Health and Addictions

Christine is the Deputy Minister of the BC Ministry of Mental Health and Addictions. The Ministry is responsible for working with government ministries, Indigenous organizations, municipalities and community partners to ensure a coherent, accessible, and culturally safe mental health and addictions system that is effective for individuals and families across the lifespan. The ministry is also responsible for leading an immediate response to the province’s overdose public health emergency.

Before being appointed as Deputy Minister, Christine served as ADM in in BC’s Ministry of Children and Family Development (MCFD) from February 2018 to November 2020. In her time at MCFD, Christine had different responsibilities including childcare policy and programs, policy for child welfare, child and youth mental health services, as well as policy and provincial programs for the early years and children and youth with extra support needs.

Christine’s other experience in the BC Government includes as Executive Director at the Ministry of Advanced Education where she led the transfer of the regulation of private career colleges from an external Crown agency to the ministry; five years at the Ministry of Health, where she led the Seniors’ Action Plan as well as a number of legislative initiatives including the BC Services Card, the new Pharmaceutical Services Act and the Seniors Advocate Act.

From 1995 to 2009, Christine worked in the post-secondary sector, including positions with the Research Universities’ Council of British Columbia, the Ministry of Advanced Education, UBC and SFU.

Christine holds an undergraduate degree (B.A.) from the University of Ottawa and a Master’s degree (M.A.) from Simon Fraser University.1)

Cancer Researcher First Appears w Weston Price Interview

Weston Price Interview - February 15, 2022 By Hilda Labrada Gore

HILDA LABRADA GORE: Curiosity has led a biostatistician down an unusual path. Intrigued by the concept that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has not ever been isolated, Christine Massey began inquiring of health departments around the world: “Do you have evidence of an isolated virus?” To date, over one hundred institutions from all over the globe have responded. . . and there has been no evidence in sight of SARS-CoV-2.

Massey, a former cancer biostatistician and a passionate advocate for safe drinking water, discusses her research on the concept of viruses (and this “virus” in particular) and what she’s learned through hundreds of Free­dom of Information (FOI) requests from health departments all over the world.

She goes over how the cultures or samples used to “isolate” a virus actually interfere with the process, and she exposes the flaws in this methodology and the problems with PCR testing. She also explains why talk of “variants” is essentially nonsense. Christine, we’re so intrigued by this topic of the virus and its isolation. Tell us about the Freedom of Information requests that you submitted to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and what their response was.

CHRISTINE MASSEY: We have five responses from the CDC. I have one done by my colleague in New Zealand, Michael, and this is the March 1, 2021 response to his request. Michael used the same wording that I used in my other requests.

He was asking for any record describing “iso­lation” (in other words, “purification”) of this alleged virus from a patient sample without mix­ing in anything genetic. I’m not talking about culturing something, PCR tests or sequencing something. I’m talking about purifying this al­leged virus. He had some back-and-forth with them.

On page two, there are some interesting comments. I’ll read a quote from the bottom of page three: “The definition of isolation pro­vided in the group request is outside of what is possible in virology, as viruses need cells to replicate, and cells require liquid food. However, the SARS-CoV-2 virus may be isolated from a human clinical specimen by culturing in cell culture, which is the definition of isolation used in microbiology.”

HG: Help us understand that. (Massey explains…) 2)

Christine Massey – Biostatistician Takes on Canadian Government.

Awake Canada - October 15, 2021 -

Christine Massey – Biostatistician Takes on Canadian Government.

This information is contained on a google drive folder for you to review, download and share. It seems very pertinent that throughout contact with 20 different government agencies, not one of these agencies could provide an isolated sample of Sars-Cov 2. This is consistent across the globe, and all of us have access to finding this out through the Freedom of Information Act here in Canada.3)

Here are the documents and videos: (Google drive cannot archive Wayback) https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1BZ7kHlWeg5pcvLMFvC-Hao8pIc4hiM-o

Update December 2023 ~ Christine Massey has 200 FOIA that resulted in zero useful information except the absence of evidence of the virus is her proof no virus exist in Nature and made it her best sport to bad mouth and bully Childrens Health Defense wasting time w mean girls drama. 4)

Interviewed by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky: On FOIA Requests

Christine Massey Interviewed by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky: On FOIA Requests & Responses to the Question — Has SARS-CoV-2 Ever Been Isolated? Does the “Virus” Exist?

Aug 18, 2021 · Christine Massey, M.Sc conducted an extensive report over a period of more than a year. The central question raised in her study is the following: “is there reliable evidence that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated from an “unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient”?

by Christine Massey and Prof Michel Chossudovsky August 18, 2021

The Chinese authorities announced on January 7, 2020 that they had isolated and identified “a new type of virus”. Then on the 28th of January 2020, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) stated that the novela corona virus had been isolated.  

Christine Massey, M.Sc conducted an extensive report over a period of more than a year. The central question raised in her study is the following:

“is there reliable evidence that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated from an “unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient”? Christine Massey submitted Freedom of Information (FOIA) requests to some 90 Health /Science institutions.

Does the Virus Exist? The responses to these requests confirm that there is no record of isolation / purification of SARS-CoV-2 “having been performed by anyone, anywhere, ever.” 

Video: Does the Virus Exist? Has SARS-CoV-2 Been Isolated? Interview with Christine Massey Here is a screenshot of the letter sent to Health /Science institutions 

[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light BitChute, Brighteon, and Odysee channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]

The Global Research website was established on the 9th of September 2001, two days before the tragic events of September 11. Barely a few days later, Global Research had become a major news source on the New World Order and Washington’s “war on terrorism”.

Since September 2001, they have established an extensive archive of news articles, in-depth reports and analysis on issues which are barely covered by the mainstream media.

In an era of media disinformation, their focus has essentially been to center on the “unspoken truth”. www.globalresearch.ca 5)

Mike Adams Interview

Dec 06, 2021 · Christine Massey reveals to the Health Ranger: Covid-19 “virus” has NEVER been isolated and shown to cause disease CDC FOIA Documents Reveal No “Covid-19” Isolated Virus In Existence Christine Massie also dropped by the Fakeologist discord for a chat about her great work soliciting evidence of any virus isolation from anywhere on the planet.

Silencing Dissent in Canada: Bench Warrant Issued for Christine Massey’s ARREST

Investigative report by Bill Huston Podcast Substack - Lioness of Judah Ministry - June 22, 2022

Bill Huston Podcast reports:

“ … Christine Massey is noteworthy 3 or 4 ways.

She is most known for her work collecting FOI requests from nearly 200 institutions in ~40 nations, no one has proof that SARS-CoV-2 exists.

Christine is also noteworthy for her LOCAL, Common Law Remedy for COVID Crimes.

Her Arrest on Bogus Criminal Charges (similar to a SLAPP suit, only those are civil matters. I’m not sure the name for these kinds of actions when they originate with the government itself… h/t: Canucklaw)

Her UTTER Cancellation by Bigtree / Kennedy / Fuellmich

Christine Massey and others had created a common law claim of indictment of Crimes Against Humanity relating to COVID vaccines, lockdowns, and other ridiculous “countermeasures” to a Fake Virus, Fake Test, Fake Etiology (search for cause), Fake Proof of Causation (Koch’s Postulates), Fake Disease, Fake Pandemic! “

Christine’s work is particularly dangerous for the elites: Fake Virus, Fake Test, and Fake Etiology notion has to be removed from the scene leaving only the “approved” dissent led by the controlled opposition.

Please read the entire report below:6)7)

Justice Stuart Konyer in the Ontario Court Of Justice

Brief notes from her CLOSED “pre-trial hearing”.

Substack - Apocalyptic Yoga - June 23, 2022 - Bill Huston

UPDATE 6/30: Please be a witness today Thu 6/30 at 2pm (Toronto/NYC), 6pm (London), 1800 UTC, or Friday 7/1 at 6am (Auckland)

At 4:07 PM today, Justice Stuart Konyer in the Ontario Court Of Justice, issued a Bench Warrant for Christine Massey, of Peterborough, after she abruptly left the Zoom virtual hearing in disgust, on charges arising from an incident which occurred 6 months ago.

On Jan 19th, 2022, Christine Massey was accused by Peterborough Medical Officer of Health Thomas Piggott of “striking him” as she stood outside his door, attempting to serve him papers:

Papers served: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Trespass-Notice-to-Thomas-Piggott-Jan-19-2022.pdf

Video of the incident: https://rumble.com/vsyncv-peterborough-moh-served-lies-to-police.html

Piggot’s statements were clearly false— filing a false police report is considered the crime of mischief— based on eyewitnesses who also recorded the events, and by Thomas Piggott’s own security camera footage, a very short excerpt was provided to Christine as part of her “Disclosure”.

  • The offence of Public Mischief is codified in Section 140 (1) of the Criminal Code which reads:
  • 140 (1) Every one commits public mischief who, with intent to mislead, causes a peace officer to enter on or continue an investigation by
  • (a) making a false statement that accuses some other person of having committed an offence;
  • (b) doing anything intended to cause some other person to be suspected of having committed an offence that the other person has not committed, or to divert suspicion from himself;
  • © reporting that an offence has been committed when it has not been committed; …

Despite protestations from the people present the night of Jan 19th when informed of Piggott’s False Police Report, the Peterborough MOH was never charged with a crime.

But Christine Massey was.8)

Christine Massey's "germ" FOI Newsletter Substack

9)

LIVING TESTIMONY IN THE FORM OF AN AFFIDAVIT OF CHRISTINE MASSEY I, Christine Anne of the Massey family, in the City of Peterborough, in Peterborough County, Ontario, Canada, declare under penalty of death that- (First four of 25 items total 9 pages)

1. I am fully competent to make this declaration and I make it voluntarily. I can confirm that I have examined exhibits marked CM and confirm they are accurate.

2. I testify as an expert to the facts set forth herein, and my statements herein are based upon personal knowledge.

3. I am trained and have worked professionally in the past as a biostatistician, with a master’s degree in biostatistics from the Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

4. In May of 2020, I began submitting freedom of information requests to Canadian health and science institutions, asking for all studies/reports in the possession/custody/control of each institution that describe the isolation/purification of the alleged “COVID-19 virus”, also referred to as “SARS-COV-2”, directly from a sample taken from a diseased human, where the patient sample was not first combined with any other source of genetic material.10)

Curious Case of Fluoride Free PEEL

Massey Has two or three blog posts from 2017 mostly reprints of policy & convention news then pivots entirely to no virus campaign using FOIA skills deployed for fluoride evidence. Canuck Law FOIA tracking for Massey. 11)

Fluoride Free PEEL Pivot to SARS-CoV2

EMAIL EXCHANGE WITH UK MHRA – Exposing the genomic sequence of SARSCov2 December 23, 2020 by Christine The following was written by Frances Leader and is re-posted from 12)

When I read the Wuhan study in Feb 2020 I was mortified by the monkey kidney & foetal cell-lines which were used as a “culture” before rt-PCR amplification. Isolation was never satisfactory at any stage thereafter. I honestly felt sick. The genome sequence was computed from this.

I set about proving that the vaccine has been created from a computer generated genomic sequence & not one isolated from an infected person, either in Wuhan or anywhere else in the world since. The Pfizer BioNTech vaccine was approved by UK MHRA (Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency) & I initiated a polite exchange of emails with them as follows -MHRA Email 1.png 13)

Fluoride Free Peel author Christine Massey archive 14)

Massey Redacted Her Own Email

15)

Newell Media Group

16)

Back to top