Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- sars-cov-2:origins [2022/04/01 16:32]
mathew exporting hoax and fish sticks
+++ sars-cov-2:origins [2022/12/06 18:41] (current)
tonika [Origins Hypotheses]
@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 The origins of the [[:SARS-CoV-2]] [[:coronavirus]] are hotly debated, but crucially important for understanding the totality of the [[:COVID-19 pandemic]].
+  * [[SARS-CoV-2:origins:DRASTIC]] (informal research group investigating SARS-CoV-2 origins)
   * [[SARS-CoV-2:origins:Earlier Origins Hypothesis]]
   * [[SARS-CoV-2:origins:Genetic Engineering Hypothesis]]
   * [[SARS-CoV-2:origins:Lab Leak Hypothesis]]
+  * [[SARS-CoV-2:origins:Venom Poisoning Hypothesis]]
   * [[SARS-CoV-2:origins:Zoonotic Origins Hypothesis]]
   * [[SARS-CoV-2:origins:Other Origins Hypotheses]]
@@ Line 15: / Line 17: @@
   * Aug 17, 2021 ([[https://thebulletin.org/2021/08/how-covid-19s-origins-were-obscured-by-the-east-and-the-west/?fbclid=IwAR2noNlIOUP-pPgnwZycaWXWQZueDb7btoD_G1cXmQ8wBQeOHzTdTvfphOg|thebulletin]]) How C19’s origins were obscured, by East and West.
   * Feb 22, 2022 Dr. [[:Robert Malone]] discusses the Wuhan lab leak theory with [[:EcoHealth Alliance]] whistleblower [[:Andrew Huff]].((February 22, 2022 | [[:TrialSite News]] | [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WvJn5D0zknM|Robert Malone and EcoHealth Whistleblower Andrew Huff Discuss Wuhan Lab Leak Theory]] via [[:YouTube]]))
+==== Research Compilations ====
+  * [[:Charles Rixey|Charles Rixey's]] [[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359855384_The_Myth_of_the_Blind_Watchmaker|The Myth of the Blind Watchmaker]]
 ==== Engineering Consensus of a Narrative ====
@@ Line 26: / Line 31: @@
 === Evidence Tampering ===
+Australian virologist Dr. Edward Holmes was targeted for congressional investigation for allegedly covering up evidence regarding the origins of SARS-CoV-2.((February 13, 2022 | Nick Holt | [[https://nickholt.substack.com/p/australian-virologist-dr-edward-holmes?r=uhalf&s=r|Australian virologist Dr Edward Holmes target of congressional investigation into cover up of Covid-19 origins]]))
 == The Missing Coronavirus Genetic Database ==
 On the 12th Sep 2019, the main database administered by [[:Shi Zhengli]] of samples and viral sequences at the [[:Wuhan Institute of Virology]] (WIV) went offline. At some point, each of the other 15 virus databases managed by the WIV was taken offline.((February, 2021 | Billy Bostickson et al | preprint | An investigation into the WIV databases that were taken offline | [[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349073738_An_investigation_into_the_WIV_databases_that_were_taken_offline|DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.28029.08160]]))
-== NIH Deletes Genomic Data ==
+== NIH Deletes Genomic Data? ==
 A FOIA filed by the Virginia group Empower Oversight Whistleblowers and Researchers revealed that on June 16, 2020, the NIH deleted genetic sequencing data from Wuhan at the behest of a Wuhan researcher. From those documents: "Professor Trevor Bedford of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center later sent the group an email stating that the deleted data seemed to support the idea that the pandemic began outside the Huanan market in Wuhan and that the matter must be analyzed properly."((March 31, 2022 | [[:ZeroHedge]] | [[https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/nih-deleted-info-wuhan-lab-covid-19-genetic-sequencing-watchdog-foia-finds|NIH Deleted Info From Wuhan Lab On Covid-19 Genetic Sequencing, Watchdog FOIA Finds]]))
+In April 2022, an NIH spokesperson stated that the data was "suppressed", but not deleted.((April 3, 2022 | [[:ZeroHedge]] | [[https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/nih-admits-it-suppressed-wuhan-lab-genetic-data-disputes-watchdogs-deleted-label|NIH Admits It "Suppressed" Wuhan Lab Genetic Data, But Disputes Watchdog's "Deleted" Label]]))
 == Rearrangement of Wuhan Data ==
@@ Line 54: / Line 62: @@
   * December 20, 2021 - Evidence for a Potential Pre-Pandemic SARS-like Coronavirus Among Animals in North America((December 20, 2021 | Trevor Hancock et al | Evidence for a Potential Pre-Pandemic SARS-like Coronavirus Among Animals in North America | [[https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.17.473265v1.full|doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.473265]]))
+===Larry Romanoff Hypothesis ===
-==== Zoonotic Origins Hypothesis ====
+[[https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2022/03/en-larry-romanoff-covid-19-theory-i.html#more]]
-Since the start of the pandemic, authorities have primarily promoted a theory of zoonotic transfer from an animal host to humans.
-=== Bat Coronaviruses ===
-SARS-CoV-2 is most highly similar to coronaviruses that have been found in bats.
-The [[:RaTG13]] [[:betacoronavirus]] is the most highly similar coronavirus to SARS-CoV-2, sharing 98.7% identical mitochondrial [[:rRNA]], but was supposedly generated from a bat fecal swab, which strikes some scientists as unlikely since metagenomic analysis shows a small 10.3% bacterial rRNA in the dataset.((November 22, 2021 | Steven E Massey | preprint | [[https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.09469|arXiv:2111.09469]]))
-More recently, close coronavirus relatives to SARS-CoV-2 have been found in bats in [[:Laos]].((September 17, 2021 | Temmam et al | preprint | [[https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-871965/v1|DOI:
-.21203/rs.3.rs-871965/v1]])) Some scientists claim this bolsters to the zoonotic origins theory while giving no answers to the numerous critiques of that theory.((September 24, 2021 | Smriti Mallapaty | [[:Nature]] | [[https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02596-2#ref-CR1|Closest known relatives of virus behind COVID-19 found in Laos]]))
-=== Conflicts of Interest ===
-Since the start of the SARS-CoV-2 origins debate, a great deal of information has surfaced regarding what at least stand out as conflicts of interest, if not outright corruption, among those defending theories of natural origins. At least $50 million in NIAID funding went to scientists instrumental in defending the natural origins hypothesis.((January 19, 2022 | [[:The Epoch Times]] | [[https://www.theepochtimes.com/scientists-who-were-instrumental-to-covid-19-natural-origins-narrative-received-over-50-million-in-niaid-funding-in-2020-2021_4220769.html|Scientists Who Were Instrumental to COVID-19 ‘Natural Origin’ Narrative Received Over $50 Million in NIAID Funding in 2020–21]]))
-=== Related Research ===
-  * July 25, 2020 - Poudel et al: Animal coronaviruses and coronavirus disease 2019: Lesson for One Health approach.((July 25, 2020 | Poudel et al | [[:Open Veterinary Journal]] | [[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC7703617/|Animal coronaviruses and coronavirus disease 2019: Lesson for One Health approach]]))