Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Both sides next revision
sars-cov-2:origins:lab_leak_hypothesis [2022/09/08 19:41]
pamela [Denials of the Lab Leak Hypothesis]
sars-cov-2:origins:lab_leak_hypothesis [2022/09/08 19:44] (current)
pamela [Congressional Investigation Findings]
Line 19: Line 19:
 ==== Congressional Investigation Findings ==== ==== Congressional Investigation Findings ====
  
-More than one year after the World Health Organization declared a pandemic, the world is still reeling from the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the disease it causes, COVID-19. More than four million people have lost their lives worldwide, including more than 612,000 Americans, while economies around the world have been devastated by the fallout. This report investigates the origin of this virus and looks at how it became a deadly pandemic.+More than one year after the [[:World Health Organization]] declared a pandemic, the world is still reeling from the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the disease it causes, COVID-19. More than four million people have lost their lives worldwide, including more than 612,000 Americans, while economies around the world have been devastated by the fallout. This report investigates the origin of this virus and looks at how it became a deadly pandemic.
  
 === The Wuhan Institute of Virology === === The Wuhan Institute of Virology ===
  
-Last September, the House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff, under the direction of Ranking Member Michael T. McCaul, released a report on the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic. That report highlighted the possibility SARS-CoV-2 could have leaked from the [[:Wuhan Institute of Virology]] (WIV). However, as we continued our investigation and uncovered more information, we now believe it’s time to completely dismiss the wet market as the source of the outbreak. We also believe the preponderance of the evidence proves the virus did leak from the WIV and that it did so sometime before September 12, 2019.+Last September, the House Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Staff, under the direction of Ranking Member [[:Michael T. McCaul]], released a report on the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic. That report highlighted the possibility SARS-CoV-2 could have leaked from the [[:Wuhan Institute of Virology]] (WIV). However, as we continued our investigation and uncovered more information, we now believe it’s time to completely dismiss the wet market as the source of the outbreak. We also believe the preponderance of the evidence proves the virus did leak from the WIV and that it did so sometime before September 12, 2019.
  
 This is based upon multiple pieces of evidence laid out in the report, including: This is based upon multiple pieces of evidence laid out in the report, including:
Line 30: Line 30:
   * Safety concerns expressed by top PRC scientists in 2019 and unusually scheduled   * Safety concerns expressed by top PRC scientists in 2019 and unusually scheduled
   * maintenance at the WIV;   * maintenance at the WIV;
-  * Athletes at the Military World Games held in Wuhan in October 2019 who+  * Athletes at the [[:Military World Games]] held in Wuhan in October 2019 who
   * became sick with symptoms similar to COVID-19 both while in Wuhan and also   * became sick with symptoms similar to COVID-19 both while in Wuhan and also
   * shortly after returning to their home countries;   * shortly after returning to their home countries;
Line 42: Line 42:
  
 === Genetic Modification === === Genetic Modification ===
-This report also lays out ample evidence that researchers at the WIV, in conjunction with U.S. scientists and funded by both the PRC government and the U.S. government, were conducting gain-of-function research on coronaviruses at the WIV, at times under BSL-2 conditions. +This report also lays out ample evidence that researchers at the WIV, in conjunction with U.S. scientists and funded by both the PRC government and the U.S. government, were conducting [[:gain-of-function]] research on coronaviruses at the WIV, at times under BSL-2 conditions. 
  
 Much of this research was focused on modifying the spike protein of coronaviruses that could not infect humans so they could bind to human immune systems. The stated purpose of this work was to identified viruses with pandemic potential and to create a broad-spectrum coronavirus vaccine. In many instances, the Much of this research was focused on modifying the spike protein of coronaviruses that could not infect humans so they could bind to human immune systems. The stated purpose of this work was to identified viruses with pandemic potential and to create a broad-spectrum coronavirus vaccine. In many instances, the
Line 48: Line 48:
 viruses – that could infect human immune systems. With dangerous research like this conducted at safety levels similar to a dentist’s office, a natural or genetically modified virus could have easily escaped the lab and infected the community. viruses – that could infect human immune systems. With dangerous research like this conducted at safety levels similar to a dentist’s office, a natural or genetically modified virus could have easily escaped the lab and infected the community.
  
-Committee Minority Staff has also identified scientists who are directly tied to the WIV, and who worked on gain-of-function research in the years prior to the start of the current pandemic, who had the ability to modify genetically modify coronaviruses without leaving any trace evidence. An American scientist, Dr. Ralph Baric, assisted in creating a method to leave no trace of genetic modification as early as 2005. +Committee Minority Staff has also identified scientists who are directly tied to the WIV, and who worked on gain-of-function research in the years prior to the start of the current pandemic, who had the ability to modify genetically modify coronaviruses without leaving any trace evidence. An American scientist, Dr. [[:Ralph Baric]], assisted in creating a method to leave no trace of genetic modification as early as 2005. 
  
 And as early as 2016, scientists working at the WIV were able to do the same. This makes it clear that claims by the scientific community that [[:SARS-CoV-2]] could not be man-made because it has no genetic modification markers are disingenuous. We conclude there is ample proof that the virus could have been genetically manipulated, and that it is vitally important we fully investigate this hypothesis to determine if that happened here. And as early as 2016, scientists working at the WIV were able to do the same. This makes it clear that claims by the scientific community that [[:SARS-CoV-2]] could not be man-made because it has no genetic modification markers are disingenuous. We conclude there is ample proof that the virus could have been genetically manipulated, and that it is vitally important we fully investigate this hypothesis to determine if that happened here.
Line 63: Line 63:
  
 === Next Steps === === Next Steps ===
-After this extensive investigation, we believe it is time to call Peter Daszak to testify before Congress. There are still many outstanding questions about the type of research he funded at the WIV that only he can answer. In addition, we believe there is legislation Congress can pass that would not only hold those responsible accountable but also help to prevent a future pandemic, including but not limited to:+After this extensive investigation, we believe it is time to call [[:Peter Daszak]] to testify before Congress. There are still many outstanding questions about the type of research he funded at the WIV that only he can answer. In addition, we believe there is legislation Congress can pass that would not only hold those responsible accountable but also help to prevent a future pandemic, including but not limited to:
  
   * Institute a ban on conducting and funding any work that includes gain-of-function research until an international and legally binding standard is set, and only where that standard is verifiably being followed.   * Institute a ban on conducting and funding any work that includes gain-of-function research until an international and legally binding standard is set, and only where that standard is verifiably being followed.
Back to top