Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
ralph_baric [2022/09/10 21:36] liam | ralph_baric [2022/09/17 22:53] (current) mathew | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
==== Coronavirus Research | ==== Coronavirus Research | ||
+ | |||
+ | === 1992 === | ||
+ | * June 11, 1992 - Baric was part of a team that published research noting how rabbit coronavirus could cause [[heart]] and [[cardiovascular]] issue including [[cardiomyopathy]], | ||
=== 2013 === | === 2013 === | ||
Line 125: | Line 128: | ||
- | ===== Controversy During the COVID-19 Pandemic | + | ===== Pandemics |
+ | Baric' | ||
- | ==== USRTK FOIA Archive | + | ==== Talks On Pandemics ==== |
+ | * Imagining the Next Flu Pandemic--and Preventing It!((April, 2018 | Ralph Baric | [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Controversy During the COVID-19 Pandemic ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | === USRTK FOIA Archive === | ||
Ralph Baric emails batch #1 (12.14.20) (83,416 pages). Dr. Ralph Baric’s emails with EcoHealth Alliance, Wuhan Institute of Virology, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences and experts in biodefense and infectious diseases.((https:// | Ralph Baric emails batch #1 (12.14.20) (83,416 pages). Dr. Ralph Baric’s emails with EcoHealth Alliance, Wuhan Institute of Virology, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences and experts in biodefense and infectious diseases.((https:// | ||
- | ==== Congressional Investigation | + | === Congressional Investigation === |
COVID Timeline with summary details at [[Peter Daszak]]. Full Report ((https:// | COVID Timeline with summary details at [[Peter Daszak]]. Full Report ((https:// | ||
- | ==== Foreign Affairs Subcommittee Summary | + | === Foreign Affairs Subcommittee Summary === |
“As we continued our investigation into the origins of the [[COVID-19 pandemic]], we uncovered even more disturbing evidence about the [[Chinese Communist Party]]’s (CCP) coverup and [[WHO Director General Tedros]]’s gross mishandling of the virus that allowed it to turn into a deadly pandemic, | “As we continued our investigation into the origins of the [[COVID-19 pandemic]], we uncovered even more disturbing evidence about the [[Chinese Communist Party]]’s (CCP) coverup and [[WHO Director General Tedros]]’s gross mishandling of the virus that allowed it to turn into a deadly pandemic, | ||
- | === Washington Post OpEd === | + | == Washington Post OpEd == |
New congressional report says covid-19 likely emerged in Wuhan months earlier than originally thought | New congressional report says covid-19 likely emerged in Wuhan months earlier than originally thought | ||
by Josh Rogin Columnist | by Josh Rogin Columnist | ||
Line 148: | Line 157: | ||
The Lancet commission on covid-19 removed Daszak from its team focusing on the origins of the pandemic after Daszak filed an updated conflict of interest statement about his collaboration with the Wuhan labs. McCaul wants him to be subpoenaed to testify and is demanding the EcoHealth Alliance hand over its relevant records to Congress.((https:// | The Lancet commission on covid-19 removed Daszak from its team focusing on the origins of the pandemic after Daszak filed an updated conflict of interest statement about his collaboration with the Wuhan labs. McCaul wants him to be subpoenaed to testify and is demanding the EcoHealth Alliance hand over its relevant records to Congress.((https:// | ||
- | ==== Lab Leak Coverup | + | === Lab Leak Coverup === |
In April 2021, in an editorial in the journal Infectious Diseases & Immunity, Shi resorted to a familiar tactic to contain the cloud of suspicion enveloping her: She invoked scientific consensus, just as the Lancet statement had. “The scientific community strongly dismisses these unproven and misleading speculations and generally accepts that SARS-CoV-2 has a natural origin and was selected either in an animal host before zoonotic transfer, or in humans following zoonotic transfer, | In April 2021, in an editorial in the journal Infectious Diseases & Immunity, Shi resorted to a familiar tactic to contain the cloud of suspicion enveloping her: She invoked scientific consensus, just as the Lancet statement had. “The scientific community strongly dismisses these unproven and misleading speculations and generally accepts that SARS-CoV-2 has a natural origin and was selected either in an animal host before zoonotic transfer, or in humans following zoonotic transfer, | ||
Line 156: | Line 165: | ||
Among the signers was Ralph Baric. Fifteen months earlier, he had worked behind the scenes to help Peter Daszak stage-manage the Lancet statement. The scientific consensus had been smashed to smithereens.((https:// | Among the signers was Ralph Baric. Fifteen months earlier, he had worked behind the scenes to help Peter Daszak stage-manage the Lancet statement. The scientific consensus had been smashed to smithereens.((https:// | ||
- | ==== Biosafety at University of North Carolina (UNC) ==== | + | === Biosafety at University of North Carolina (UNC) === |
- | === Engineered COVID-19-Infected Mouse Bites Researcher Amid ‘Explosion’ of Risky Coronavirus Research | + | == Engineered COVID-19-Infected Mouse Bites Researcher Amid ‘Explosion’ of Risky Coronavirus Research == |
by Jonathan Latham August 17, 2020 | by Jonathan Latham August 17, 2020 | ||
Line 179: | Line 188: | ||
In part this is because the minutes of the relevant IBC meeting (May 6th, 2020, p109) are extremely brief. They do not provide any details of the fate of the bitten researcher. Nor do they state, for example, whether the researcher developed an active infection, nor whether they developed symptoms, nor if they transmitted the recombinant virus to anyone else. Neither do they reveal what kind of [[recombinant virus]] was being used or the purpose of the experiment. ((https:// | In part this is because the minutes of the relevant IBC meeting (May 6th, 2020, p109) are extremely brief. They do not provide any details of the fate of the bitten researcher. Nor do they state, for example, whether the researcher developed an active infection, nor whether they developed symptoms, nor if they transmitted the recombinant virus to anyone else. Neither do they reveal what kind of [[recombinant virus]] was being used or the purpose of the experiment. ((https:// | ||
- | === Redactions of Biosafety Committee discussions | + | == Redactions of Biosafety Committee discussions == |
The second reason for this lack of information is that the UNC redacted the names of [[Principal Investigators]] (PIs) whose research required biosafety scrutiny, along with many of the experimental specifics. | The second reason for this lack of information is that the UNC redacted the names of [[Principal Investigators]] (PIs) whose research required biosafety scrutiny, along with many of the experimental specifics. | ||
Line 207: | Line 216: | ||
- | ==== Wuhan BSL Connection | + | === Wuhan BSL Connection === |
Inside the risky bat-virus engineering that links America to Wuhan | Inside the risky bat-virus engineering that links America to Wuhan | ||
China emulated US techniques to construct novel coronaviruses in unsafe conditions. | China emulated US techniques to construct novel coronaviruses in unsafe conditions. | ||
Line 217: | Line 226: | ||
Unnoticed by most, however, was a key difference that significantly shifted the risk calculation. The Chinese work was carried out at biosafety level 2 (BSL-2), a much lower tier than Baric’s BSL-3+.((https:// | Unnoticed by most, however, was a key difference that significantly shifted the risk calculation. The Chinese work was carried out at biosafety level 2 (BSL-2), a much lower tier than Baric’s BSL-3+.((https:// | ||
- | ==== Did Ralph Baric of UNC Design Omicron? | + | |
+ | === Did Ralph Baric of UNC Design Omicron? === | ||
"COVID Bioweapon Against Mice" Patent 11225508 | "COVID Bioweapon Against Mice" Patent 11225508 | ||
March 30, 2022 by Igor Chudov | March 30, 2022 by Igor Chudov |