Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- covid-19_vaccines:systemic_risks:fertility [2022/01/04 17:27]
mathew created
+++ covid-19_vaccines:systemic_risks:fertility [2022/01/07 16:52] (current)
robert [Evidence to the contrary of CDC Claims:] Added NIH menstruation study
@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 =====Current Research on the Impact of Vaccination during Pregnancy=====
-**Current CDC Guidance**: COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for people who are pregnant, breastfeeding, trying to get pregnant now, or might become pregnant in the future. This recommendation was likely based on a flawed report by Shimabukuro (Shimabukuro TT, Kim SY, Myers TR, et al. 2021. //Preliminary findings of mRNA Covid-19 vaccine safety in pregnant persons.// __New England Journal of Medicine__ 384(24): 2273–82. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2104983
+**Current CDC Guidance**: COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for people who are pregnant, breastfeeding, trying to get pregnant now, or might become pregnant in the future. This recommendation was likely based on a flawed report by Shimabukuro (Shimabukuro TT, Kim SY, Myers TR, et al. 2021. //Preliminary findings of mRNA Covid-19 vaccine safety in pregnant persons.// __New England Journal of Medicine__ 384(24): 2273–82.((https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2104983))
 > Apr 21, 2021 ([[https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983|NEJM]]) 14% pregnancy terminations after vaccination. No mention of background rate for comparison? Further reading: relative risk not all that different [so far].
@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 ==== Evidence to the contrary of CDC Claims: ====
->The Shimabukuro claim was recently rebutted via a peer-reviewed blind review process in the November 2021 edition of __Science, Public Health Policy and the Law__: Volume 4:130–143 (Clinical and Translational Research) - //Spontaneous Abortions and Policies on COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Use During Pregnancy//
+The Shimabukuro claim was recently rebutted via a peer-reviewed blind review process in the November 2021 edition of __Science, Public Health Policy and the Law__: Volume 4:130–143 (Clinical and Translational Research) - //Spontaneous Abortions and Policies on COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Use During Pregnancy// which states;
->"Our re-analysis indicates a cumulative incidence of spontaneous abortion 7 to 8 times higher than the original authors’ results (p < 0.001) and the typical average for pregnancy loss during this time period"
-[[https://cf5e727d-d02d-4d71-89ff-9fe2d3ad957f.filesusr.com/ugd/adf864_2bd97450072f4364a65e5cf1d7384dd4.pdf]]
+>"Our re-analysis indicates a cumulative incidence of spontaneous abortion 7 to 8 times higher than the original authors’ results (p < 0.001) and the typical average for pregnancy loss during this time period.(([[https://cf5e727d-d02d-4d71-89ff-9fe2d3ad957f.filesusr.com/ugd/adf864_2bd97450072f4364a65e5cf1d7384dd4.pdf | Spontaneous Abortions and Policies on COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Use During Pregnancy]]))
 The Vaccine Manufacturers own inserts make no claims regarding safety during pregnancy:
@@ Line 20: / Line 19: @@
 > “Available data on COMIRNATY administered to pregnant women are insufficient to inform vaccine-associated risks in pregnancy.”
-=== Links ===
+Reports started to emerge towards the end of 2021 of increased numbers of still-births in British Columbia, the US and in Scotland.(([[https://fox26newshenry.com/2021/11/30/sudden-surge-in-stillbirths-and-menstrual-changes/|Sudden Surge in Stillbirths and Menstrual Changes]]))(([[https://truthpress.news/news/foia-docs-reveal-pfizer-shot-caused-avalanche-of-miscarriages-stillborn-babies/ | FOIA Docs Reveal Pfizer Shot Caused Avalanche Of Miscarriages, Stillborn Babies]]))
-[[https://fox26newshenry.com/2021/11/30/sudden-surge-in-stillbirths-and-menstrual-changes/|Sudden Surge in Stillbirths and Menstrual Changes]]
+In early January, 2022, Dr. Sam Bailey released a well-cited video, demonstrating that work has been going on to develop a anti-fertility vaccine for decades. She further shows that the Gates and the Rockefellers have been openly discussing this (and funding it) for a long time.
+{{ :covid-19_vaccines:systemic_risks:anti-fertility-vaccines-population-control.mp4 |}}
+As you watch the 16-minute presentation, it might be worth gazing upon the following images;
+{{ :covid-19_vaccines:systemic_risks:foetal_malformations.jpg?600 |}}
+{{:covid-19_vaccines:systemic_risks:kissinger_depop.jpg?200|}} {{ :covid-19_vaccines:systemic_risks:50-prince-philip-858ivirus.jpg?400|}}
+January 6, 2022: "COVID-19 vaccination associated with a small, temporary increase in menstrual cycle length, suggests NIH-funded study"((https://www.nichd.nih.gov/newsroom/news/010622-COVID-19-vaccine-menstruation))