You are here: Welcome » COVID-19 » COVID-19 Treatments and Philosophies » Drug Therapies Researched or Applied to Treat COVID-19 » Chloroquine for the Prevention or Treatment of COVID-19

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Both sides next revision
covid-19:treatments:drug_therapies:chloroquine [2022/01/14 03:52]
mathew 		covid-19:treatments:drug_therapies:chloroquine [2022/01/17 22:58] (current)
liam [Cognitive Warfare]
Line 12: Line 12:
 ==== Cognitive Warfare ==== ==== Cognitive Warfare ====
  
-A [[https://www.innovationhub-act.org/sites/default/files/2021-01/20210122_CW%20Final.pdf|document]] prepared by Innovation Hub for [[NATO]] describes an intentional deception surrounding chloroquine, perhaps even as a method of inflicting harm:+A [[https://www.innovationhub-act.org/sites/default/files/2021-01/20210122_CW%20Final.pdf|document]] prepared by Innovation Hub for [[:NATO]] describes an intentional deception surrounding chloroquine, perhaps even as a method of inflicting harm:
  
 "As the example of COVID-19 shows, the massive amount of texts on the subject, including deliberately biased texts (example is the Lancet study on chloroquine) created an information and knowledge overload which, in turn, generates both a loss of credibility and a need for closure. Therefore the ability for humans to question, normally, any data/information presented is hampered, with a tendency to fall back on biases to the detriment of unfettered decision-making."((du Cluzel, F., Cole, A., & le Guyader, H. (2020, November). //Cognitive Warfare.// Innovation Hub - ACT. Retrieved November 15, 2021, from https://www.innovationhub-act.org/sites/default/files/2021-01/20210122_CW%20Final.pdf)) "As the example of COVID-19 shows, the massive amount of texts on the subject, including deliberately biased texts (example is the Lancet study on chloroquine) created an information and knowledge overload which, in turn, generates both a loss of credibility and a need for closure. Therefore the ability for humans to question, normally, any data/information presented is hampered, with a tendency to fall back on biases to the detriment of unfettered decision-making."((du Cluzel, F., Cole, A., & le Guyader, H. (2020, November). //Cognitive Warfare.// Innovation Hub - ACT. Retrieved November 15, 2021, from https://www.innovationhub-act.org/sites/default/files/2021-01/20210122_CW%20Final.pdf))
Back to top