You are here: Welcome » COVID-19 » COVID-19 Treatments and Philosophies » Drug Therapies Researched or Applied to Treat COVID-19 » Chloroquine for the Prevention or Treatment of COVID-19

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
Both sides next revision
covid-19:treatments:drug_therapies:chloroquine [2021/12/26 23:28]
robert [Pre-Pandemic Research] 		covid-19:treatments:drug_therapies:chloroquine [2022/01/17 22:58] (current)
liam [Cognitive Warfare]
Line 6: Line 6:
 ==== Pre-Pandemic Research ==== ==== Pre-Pandemic Research ====
  
-A 2005 study called [[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/ | "Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread"]] by Vincent, Bergeron et al.+  * In 2005, researcher Martin Vincent and colleagues noted that chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.((August 22, 2005 | Vincent et al | [[:Virology Journal]] | [[https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1743-422X-2-69|doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-2-69]]))
  
 ===== Controversy ===== ===== Controversy =====
Line 12: Line 12:
 ==== Cognitive Warfare ==== ==== Cognitive Warfare ====
  
-A [[https://www.innovationhub-act.org/sites/default/files/2021-01/20210122_CW%20Final.pdf|document]] prepared by Innovation Hub for [[NATO]] describes an intentional deception surrounding chloroquine, perhaps even as a method of inflicting harm:+A [[https://www.innovationhub-act.org/sites/default/files/2021-01/20210122_CW%20Final.pdf|document]] prepared by Innovation Hub for [[:NATO]] describes an intentional deception surrounding chloroquine, perhaps even as a method of inflicting harm:
  
 "As the example of COVID-19 shows, the massive amount of texts on the subject, including deliberately biased texts (example is the Lancet study on chloroquine) created an information and knowledge overload which, in turn, generates both a loss of credibility and a need for closure. Therefore the ability for humans to question, normally, any data/information presented is hampered, with a tendency to fall back on biases to the detriment of unfettered decision-making."((du Cluzel, F., Cole, A., & le Guyader, H. (2020, November). //Cognitive Warfare.// Innovation Hub - ACT. Retrieved November 15, 2021, from https://www.innovationhub-act.org/sites/default/files/2021-01/20210122_CW%20Final.pdf)) "As the example of COVID-19 shows, the massive amount of texts on the subject, including deliberately biased texts (example is the Lancet study on chloroquine) created an information and knowledge overload which, in turn, generates both a loss of credibility and a need for closure. Therefore the ability for humans to question, normally, any data/information presented is hampered, with a tendency to fall back on biases to the detriment of unfettered decision-making."((du Cluzel, F., Cole, A., & le Guyader, H. (2020, November). //Cognitive Warfare.// Innovation Hub - ACT. Retrieved November 15, 2021, from https://www.innovationhub-act.org/sites/default/files/2021-01/20210122_CW%20Final.pdf))
Back to top