You are here: Welcome » COVID-19 » COVID-19 Treatments and Philosophies » Drug Therapies Researched or Applied to Treat COVID-19 » Chloroquine for the Prevention or Treatment of COVID-19

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision		Previous revision
Both sides next revision
covid-19:treatments:drug_therapies:chloroquine [2021/12/26 12:52]
mathew created/imported from removed page		covid-19:treatments:drug_therapies:chloroquine [2022/01/17 22:58] (current)
liam [Cognitive Warfare]
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 ==== Pre-Pandemic Research ==== ==== Pre-Pandemic Research ====
 +
 +  * In 2005, researcher Martin Vincent and colleagues noted that chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.((August 22, 2005 | Vincent et al | [[:Virology Journal]] | [[https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1743-422X-2-69|doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-2-69]]))
  
 ===== Controversy ===== ===== Controversy =====
Line 10: Line 12:
 ==== Cognitive Warfare ==== ==== Cognitive Warfare ====
  
-A [[https://www.innovationhub-act.org/sites/default/files/2021-01/20210122_CW%20Final.pdf|document]] prepared by Innovation Hub for [[NATO]] describes an intentional deception surrounding chloroquine, perhaps even as a method of inflicting harm:+A [[https://www.innovationhub-act.org/sites/default/files/2021-01/20210122_CW%20Final.pdf|document]] prepared by Innovation Hub for [[:NATO]] describes an intentional deception surrounding chloroquine, perhaps even as a method of inflicting harm:
  
 "As the example of COVID-19 shows, the massive amount of texts on the subject, including deliberately biased texts (example is the Lancet study on chloroquine) created an information and knowledge overload which, in turn, generates both a loss of credibility and a need for closure. Therefore the ability for humans to question, normally, any data/information presented is hampered, with a tendency to fall back on biases to the detriment of unfettered decision-making."((du Cluzel, F., Cole, A., & le Guyader, H. (2020, November). //Cognitive Warfare.// Innovation Hub - ACT. Retrieved November 15, 2021, from https://www.innovationhub-act.org/sites/default/files/2021-01/20210122_CW%20Final.pdf)) "As the example of COVID-19 shows, the massive amount of texts on the subject, including deliberately biased texts (example is the Lancet study on chloroquine) created an information and knowledge overload which, in turn, generates both a loss of credibility and a need for closure. Therefore the ability for humans to question, normally, any data/information presented is hampered, with a tendency to fall back on biases to the detriment of unfettered decision-making."((du Cluzel, F., Cole, A., & le Guyader, H. (2020, November). //Cognitive Warfare.// Innovation Hub - ACT. Retrieved November 15, 2021, from https://www.innovationhub-act.org/sites/default/files/2021-01/20210122_CW%20Final.pdf))
Back to top