You are here: Welcome » Andrew Huff

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Both sides next revision
andrew_huff [2022/12/07 06:41]
pamela
andrew_huff [2023/07/22 17:33] (current)
pamela [Interviews]
Line 1: Line 1:
-===== Andrew G. Huff PhD =====+====== Andrew Huff =====
 {{ ::andrew_huff_msu_prof_pic.png?200|}} {{ ::andrew_huff_msu_prof_pic.png?200|}}
 +
 +**Andrew Huff**, PhD, MS is an American epidemiologist based in [[united_states:Michigan]]. He served as an Assistant Professor at [[Michigan State University]]'s College of Veterinary Medicine.((//Andrew Huff, PhD, MS.// College of Veterinary Medicine at MSU. Retrieved September 26, 2021, from https://web.archive.org/web/20210926192718/https://cvm.msu.edu/directory/huff-1))
 +
 +===== History =====
 +
 +Huff co-founded [[MTRX Health]] with [[Brock Arnold]] in 2016.((//About Us.// MTRX Health. Retrieved May 27, 2022, from http://archive.today/2022.05.27-195230/https://mtrx.io/about-us/))
 +
 +===== Activities =====
 +
 +==== Interviews ====
 +
 +  * January 6, 2023: [[https://rumble.com/v2482o2-twitter-files-wmatt-taibbi-wuhan-lab-leak-whistleblower-january-6th-first-h.html|Twitter Files w/Matt Taibbi, Wuhan Lab Leak Whistleblower, January 6th First Hand Account]]
 +
 +  * Jun 12, 6:24 pm EDT Tommy's Podcast ((https://rumble.com/v2ttc8y-covid-19-lab-leak-dr.-andrew-huff-tpc-1254.html))
 +Covid-19 Lab Leak | Dr. Andrew Huff (TPC #1,254)
 +===== External links =====
 +
 +  * [[https://www.crunchbase.com/person/andrew-huff-d201|Crunchbase]]
 +
 +----
 +//Everything below this line needs to be cleaned up.//
 +
  
 ==== Michigan State Bio ==== ==== Michigan State Bio ====
Line 54: Line 77:
 CVM Articles featuring Andrew Huff - **Experts Revamp Food Protection** and Defense Course ((https://web.archive.org/web/20161031224937/https://cvm.msu.edu/directory/huff-1)) CVM Articles featuring Andrew Huff - **Experts Revamp Food Protection** and Defense Course ((https://web.archive.org/web/20161031224937/https://cvm.msu.edu/directory/huff-1))
  
 +==== Mrs. Andrew G. Huff PhD - Emily Huff PhD ====
 +{{ ::emily_huff_forest_pres_pic.png?200|}}
 +(bio included as published research co-author w Andrew below)
  
 +President Michigan Forest Association 
  
 +Dr. Emily Huff is an Assistant Professor at [[:Michigan State University]] with a B.A. in Environmental Science, an M.S. in Silviculture from the [[:University of Minnesota]], and a Ph.D. in Forestry (concentration in **social psychology**) from the [[:University of Maine]]. 
 +
 +Prior to joining the faculty at MSU, she worked for the U.S. Forest Service, helping to run the **National Woodland Owner Survey**. Emily’s research focuses on private forest landowner behavior, using many different tools like surveys, interviews, and statistical models. 
 +
 +Emily has served on the Michigan Forest Foundation board for 2 years (1 year as treasurer) and helped bring **Women Owning Woodlands** initiatives to Michigan, with the help of other MFA board members. Emily recently relocated with her family to a home in Champion, Michigan (outside Marquette) where she plans to teach remotely and begin working with the forestry community in the Upper Peninsula. She is now a woodland owner, with 171 acres, which she enjoys with her husband Andrew and two German Shorthaired Pointers. ((https://web.archive.org/web/20221207054919/https://michiganforests.org/board-of-directors/))
  
 ==== EnHS Graduate Receives $4.6 Million Grant from Defense Threat Reduction Agency ==== ==== EnHS Graduate Receives $4.6 Million Grant from Defense Threat Reduction Agency ====
Line 74: Line 106:
  
 ==== Published Research ==== ==== Published Research ====
- 
-=== PREDICT Zika Virus Track and Trace === 
-{{ ::andrew_huff_zika_predict_dtra_2016.png?600|}} 
- 
-FLIRT-ing with Zika: A Web Application to Predict the Movement of Infected Travelers Validated Against the Current Zika Virus Epidemic 
-June 10, 2016 · Research Article  
- 
-Authors - [[:Andrew Huff]], [[:Toph Allen]], [[:Karissa Whiting]], [[:Nathan Breit]], [[:Brock Arnold]] 
- 
-Abstract - Introduction 
- 
-Beginning in 2015, **Zika virus rapidly spread throughout the Americas and has been linked to neurological and autoimmune diseases in adults and babies.** Developing accurate tools to anticipate Zika spread is one of the first steps to mitigate further spread of the disease. When combined, air traffic data and network simulations can be used to create tools to predict where infectious disease may spread to and aid in the prevention of infectious diseases. Specific goals were to: 1) predict where travelers infected with the Zika Virus would arrive in the U.S.; and, 2) analyze and validate the open access web application’s (i.e., FLIRT) predictions using data collected after the prediction was made. 
- 
-Method: FLIRT was built to predict the flow and likely destinations of infected travelers through the air travel network. FLIRT uses a** database of flight schedules from over 800 airlines**, and can display direct flight traffic and perform passenger simulations between selected airports.  
- 
-FLIRT was used to analyze flights departing from five selected airports in locations where sustained Zika Virus transmission was occurring. FLIRT’s predictions were validated against Zika cases arriving in the U.S. from selected airports during the selected time periods.  Kendall’s τ and Generalized Linear Models were computed for all permutations of FLIRT and case data to test the accuracy of FLIRT’s predictions. 
- 
-Results: FLIRT was found to be predictive of the final destinations of infected travelers in the U.S. from areas with ongoing transmission of Zika in the Americas from 01 February 2016 – 01 to April 2016, and 11 January 2016 to 11 March 2016 time periods. MIA-FLL, JFK-EWR-LGA, and IAH were top ranked at-risk metro areas, and **Florida, Texas and New York were top ranked states at-risk** for the future time period analyzed (11 March 2016 – 11 June 2016). For the 11 January 2016 to 11 March 2016 time period, the region-aggregated model indicated 7.24 (95% CI 6.85 – 7.62) imported Zika cases per 100,000 passengers, and the state-aggregated model suggested 11.33 (95% CI 10.80 – 11.90) imported Zika cases per 100,000 passengers. 
- 
-Discussion: The results from 01 February 2016 to 01 April 2016 and 11 January 2016 to 11 March 2016 time periods support that **modeling air travel and passenger movement can be a powerful tool** in predicting where infectious diseases will spread next. As FLIRT was shown to significantly predict distribution of Zika Virus cases in the past, there should be heightened biosurveillance and educational campaigns to medical service providers and the general public in these states, especially in the large metropolitan areas.   
-Funding Statement 
-This study was made possible by the **generous support** of Defense Threat Reduction Agency [[:DTRA]] through a contract (Contract No. HDTRA1-13-C-0029). The contents are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of [[:DTRA]] or the United States Government. 
-((https://web.archive.org/web/20160614091127/http://currents.plos.org/outbreaks/article/flirt-ing-with-zika-a-web-application-to-predict-the-movement-of-infected-travelers-validated-against-the-current-zika-virus-epidemic/)) 
- 
- 
- 
-=== Farmer Biosecurity Nudge Assessment === 
 {{ ::andrew_huff_farmer_biosec_nudge_research_2.png?400|}} {{ ::andrew_huff_farmer_biosec_nudge_research_2.png?400|}}
 Understanding farmers’ biosecurity beliefs and behaviours related to antimicrobial resistant bacteria in Michigan, USA Understanding farmers’ biosecurity beliefs and behaviours related to antimicrobial resistant bacteria in Michigan, USA
Line 179: Line 184:
 Here is the link to the PNAS paper and its supplement (see Table S6) containing links to all of the available published (and some unpublished) evidence on COVID-19 origins:  ((https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2202871119)) Here is the link to the PNAS paper and its supplement (see Table S6) containing links to all of the available published (and some unpublished) evidence on COVID-19 origins:  ((https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2202871119))
  
 +==== Movie of the Week Whistleblower Target Fable ====
 +
 +=== Interview Critique === 
 +Andrew the l33t h4x0r has an intruder break in to delete a pic on his laptop as Andrew is installing a surveillance camera outside. Unlike every hyper paranoid whistleblower who anticipates retaliation. Hard to decide what's worse Huff's InfoSec or his OpSec but both rot. FBI cyber teams have spent months trying to crack passwords on laptops alleged to be used for unauthorized access of data. All that aside, if FBI wants a laptop they get FISA court to rubber stamp a warrant and they empty your house just like they did with Trump at Mara Lago ffs.
 +
 +This is chock full of PBS talking points to advance a bouquet of narratives.
 +
 +Likening himself to Julian Assange is beyond the pale of hangnail hysterid outrageously adding "I couldn't believe it was happening. I felt like a bad dream. I had the [[:Julian Assange]] treatment, **but I hadn't done anything illegal**. His remarks about sources and whistleblowers are all wrong and negative for Julian who is a publisher whose only crime is truth.
 +
 +Huff goes on to claim hacking is now only done by FBI who spent many million tailing him. Long before Snowden, when genuine whistleblower Thomas Drake exposed NSA domestic spying he was charged under 1917 Espionage Act. Drake got some of the worst FBI harassment among group of DC whistleblowers. Almost two years of FBI parked outside his house every lunch hour while he was bankrupted with legal fees, forced to work in an Apple store & his life was destroyed by process. 
 +((https://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2016/12/23/this-is-how-the-u-s-government-destroys-the-lives-of-patriotic-whistleblowers/#more-40910))
 +      
 +
 +=== Andrew Huff's Harrowing Ordeal In His Own Words ==== 
 +(small selection of gems & it's a small world quote from Andrew Huff's atty Thomas Renz)
 +{{ ::andrew_huff_whistleblower_fbi_stalking_headline.png?600|}}
 +Andrew Huff: Wuhan whistleblower claims FBI spied on him with drones and broke into home to silence him
 +
 +'My one-and-a-half-year-old son was anxious, frightened, and neurotic at the height of the illegal harassment,' Andrew Huff said in his book
 +
 +
 +December 6, 2022 Media Entertainment Arts WorldWide By Srinija Grandhi    
 +
 +Dr Huff, a specialist on bioterrorism and biowarfare, claimed that "the government hacked his computer," which caused a months-long delay in publishing his book on Wuhan. He told The Sun, "It was crazy… I couldn't believe it was happening. I felt like a bad dream. I had the [[:Julian Assange]] treatment, **but I hadn't done anything illegal**. 
 +
 +To put it bluntly, **I have balls of steel**, and I'm not afraid of these people." He added, "I can tell you the US government agencies involved were the FBI, the Defence Intelligence Agency, and the Department of Homeland Security. All the sources of the hacking went back to the Department of Defence. I used to work on teams who developed this kind of technology... then I became the target."
 +
 +Dr Huff stated that every day, military-grade drones allegedly showed up at his house, he was stalked in the grocery store and all around the nation, and unidentified vehicles frequently followed him. He claimed that his home was broken into, that his phone had been routinely hacked, and that someone had even shot a bullet into his mailbox, as per the news outlet. Huff alleges that he witnessed a horrific incident in which a man broke into his home and attempted to erase a photo on his computer as he was outside installing a security camera. He told The Sun, "I used to have top security clearance. The government typically doesn't go after the person who receives a leak. They go after the person who leaks the information. The type of thing they did to me, I've heard of the government doing that to people who leak information. That's not shocking or surprising - but they never do it to the person who receives the information."
 +
 +The scientist estimates that a team of 20 to 30 persons running the "spying" operation would have cost the government up to $50 million over the course of more than a year. Huff claimed that he reported more than fifty federal offenses against him; however, he claims that the FBI declined to look into these claims because they were "complicit in the crimes." The scientist penned in his book, "Their goal was to discredit me, to scare me, and to prevent me from speaking out." He added, "I collected piles of cold, hard evidence of the crimes committed against me by the US government, including photographic evidence of trespassers and highly sophisticated drones being flown at distances of a few feet from my house caught on camouflaged motion activated trail cameras."
 +
 +In his book, Dr Huff lists a number of occurrences that are part of a temporary restraining order and injunction that his attorney, [[:Thomas Renz]], is drafting against the US government and Michigan police. ((https://web.archive.org/web/20221207061410/https://meaww.com/andrew-huff-wuhan-lab-leak-whistleblower-claims-fbi-spied-on-him-drones-broke-into-home-silence-him-595266))
Back to top