Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
university_of_oxford [2022/08/29 00:26] pamela [COVID mRNA Transfections] | university_of_oxford [2022/08/29 02:48] (current) pamela [Bogus Models for Social Distancing Propaganda] | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The University of Oxford is a collegiate research university in Oxford, England. There is evidence of teaching as early as 1096, making it the oldest university in the English-speaking world and the world' | The University of Oxford is a collegiate research university in Oxford, England. There is evidence of teaching as early as 1096, making it the oldest university in the English-speaking world and the world' | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== COVID Research Funding ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Five projects from across Oxford University' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Twenty-one new studies into the novel coronavirus have been funded by the UK government, including the first clinical drug trial in primary care, vaccine and therapy development, | ||
+ | |||
+ | This second round of projects receive £14.1 million as part of the £24.6 million rapid research response funded by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), and by the Department of Health and Social Care through the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). | ||
+ | |||
+ | These projects build on the UK’s world-class expertise and capability in global heath and infectious disease that has already shaped our understanding of the pandemic and is informing measures to tackle it. They support the UK government’s efforts to save lives, protect the vulnerable and support the NHS so it can help those who need it the most. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[:UK Research and Innovation]] Chief Executive, Professor Sir [[:Mark Walport]] said: 'The research community’s response to the Covid-19 crisis has been outstanding. In a matter of weeks, researchers have formed projects to develop potential vaccines, repurpose existing drugs and explore the potential for new medicines, and to examine how the virus is transmitted and causes wide variation in symptoms. Pre-clinical trials of vaccines and clinical trials of drugs are already underway. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 'The pace at which this work has been carried out is tribute to the UK’s world-class research base and its dedication to the fight against this disease.' | ||
+ | |||
+ | The projects will run over a maximum 18-month period, ensuring timely insights into the current epidemic. | ||
+ | |||
+ | This research funding has been coordinated with other funders and the [[:World Health Organization]] (WHO) to ensure there is not duplication of effort and expertise is applied strategically. | ||
+ | |||
+ | On 30 March, UKRI and NIHR launched a joint rolling call for researchers to apply for funding for short-term projects addressing and mitigating the health, social, economic, cultural and environmental impacts of the COVID-19 outbreak. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Oxford' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Professor [[: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Professor [[:Matthew Snape]], [[:Oxford Vaccine Group]], £0.6 million: With [[:Public Health England]], they will use an existing study of infectious disease immunity in children and teenagers 0 to 19 years old to study the presence of antibodies against COVID-19 (a marker of having had the disease and now having immunity) in approximately 400 children and teenagers per month for the duration of the COVID-19 outbreak, and they will collect information on recent respiratory illnesses and relevant medical history. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Professor [[:Trudie Lang]], Nuffield Department of Medicine, £0.3 million: Building on lessons learnt in the [[:Zika]] and [[:Ebola]] outbreaks, the [[:Global Health Network]] will deliver and share trusted research tools, guidance and training, for example providing guidance on how to run studies in local clinics and hospitals. They will work with partners internationally to create lasting research networks to support evidence generation in challenging settings, so that better quality, standardised data is shared faster worldwide. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Professor [[:Sally Sheard]], [[: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Dr [[:Sumana Sanyal]], [[:Sir William Dunn School of Pathology]], | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Bogus Models for Social Distancing Propaganda ==== | ||
+ | {{ :: | ||
+ | Social distancing works: Here’s the Maths | ||
+ | 6th Apr 2020 Sarah Whitebloom | ||
+ | |||
+ | Considerable uncertainty surrounds Covid-19 - how long it will take before a vaccine is developed, the death rate amongst cases and even how many cases there have been so far. But there is one thing of which we can be sure: social distancing works, according to a mathematical modelling expert from Oxford University. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Dr Robin Thompson, a junior research fellow in [[: | ||
+ | {{ :: | ||
Line 30: | Line 72: | ||
==== Misinformation Research Lab ==== | ==== Misinformation Research Lab ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | === Initiative on Vaccine Misinformation === | ||
+ | |||
+ | The Challenge | ||
+ | |||
+ | Long-held scientific consensus on vital issues such as climate change or the vaccines is increasingly contested, heavily debated on social media and even in the mainstream news media. New technological innovations like artificial intelligence are discussed in terms that veer from the alarmist to the exuberant. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Public understanding of key issues in science and technology is often limited and misinformation about basic issues in science and technology - from natural selection to global warming - abounds. | ||
+ | |||
+ | How can we better understand public discussions of science and technology, and what can be done to improve them? | ||
+ | |||
+ | In this three-year programme researchers from the [[:Oxford Internet Institute]] and the [[:Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism]] are examining the interplay between systematic misinformation campaigns, news coverage, and increasingly important social media platforms for public understanding of science and technological innovation. The programme looks at the problem of “junk science”, “fake news” and public policy issues. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Oxford Martin [[: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Our aim is to combine social science and computer science to address the damaging impact of computational [[: | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Political Policy Influence === | ||
+ | [[:Rasmus Kleis Nielsen]], Co-Director of the Oxford Martin Programme on Misinformation, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Professor Nielsen says: “Democratic societies need quality information, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Nielsen will bring to the group the [[:Reuters Institute]]’s commitment to connecting independent, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Based on input from academics, technology companies, news media and civil society organisations, | ||
+ | |||
+ |