You are here: Welcome » University of Oxford

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Both sides next revision
university_of_oxford [2022/08/29 00:26]
pamela [COVID mRNA Transfections]
university_of_oxford [2022/08/29 02:48] (current)
pamela [Bogus Models for Social Distancing Propaganda]
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 The University of Oxford is a collegiate research university in Oxford, England. There is evidence of teaching as early as 1096, making it the oldest university in the English-speaking world and the world's second-oldest university in continuous operation. The University of Oxford is a collegiate research university in Oxford, England. There is evidence of teaching as early as 1096, making it the oldest university in the English-speaking world and the world's second-oldest university in continuous operation.
 +
 +==== COVID Research Funding ====
 +
 +Five projects from across Oxford University's Medical Sciences Division are amongst twenty-one new studies into the novel coronavirus which have been funded by the UK government.
 +
 +Twenty-one new studies into the novel coronavirus have been funded by the UK government, including the first clinical drug trial in primary care, vaccine and therapy development, and studying epidemiology, disease transmission, behavioral interventions and policy approaches to COVID-19.
 +
 +This second round of projects receive £14.1 million as part of the £24.6 million rapid research response funded by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), and by the Department of Health and Social Care through the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR).
 +
 +These projects build on the UK’s world-class expertise and capability in global heath and infectious disease that has already shaped our understanding of the pandemic and is informing measures to tackle it. They support the UK government’s efforts to save lives, protect the vulnerable and support the NHS so it can help those who need it the most.
 +
 +[[:UK Research and Innovation]] Chief Executive, Professor Sir [[:Mark Walport]] said: 'The research community’s response to the Covid-19 crisis has been outstanding. In a matter of weeks, researchers have formed projects to develop potential vaccines, repurpose existing drugs and explore the potential for new medicines, and to examine how the virus is transmitted and causes wide variation in symptoms. Pre-clinical trials of vaccines and clinical trials of drugs are already underway.
 +
 +'The pace at which this work has been carried out is tribute to the UK’s world-class research base and its dedication to the fight against this disease.'
 +
 +The projects will run over a maximum 18-month period, ensuring timely insights into the current epidemic.
 +
 +This research funding has been coordinated with other funders and the [[:World Health Organization]] (WHO) to ensure there is not duplication of effort and expertise is applied strategically.
 +
 +On 30 March, UKRI and NIHR launched a joint rolling call for researchers to apply for funding for short-term projects addressing and mitigating the health, social, economic, cultural and environmental impacts of the COVID-19 outbreak.
 +
 +=== Oxford's Medical Sciences Division research projects funded ===
 +
 +Professor [[:Christopher Butler]], Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, £1.7 million: The first clinical trial in COVID-19 patients consulting in primary care, ‘[[:PRINCIPLE]]’, will initially test if the anti-malarial drug hydroxychloroquine can reduce the need for people to go to hospital or speed up their recovery. They will recruit patients aged over 65 years (or aged 50-64 years with underlying health conditions), who consult in primary care (this trial is a national platform trial and is potentially available to all GP practices in the UK) and have COVID-19 symptoms. Patients will be tested for COVID-19 where possible, and will receive either the usual care provided plus [[:hydroxychloroquine]] 200mg twice a day for 7 days, or, soon, [[:azithromycin]] for 3-5 days, or usual supportive care without any experimental treatment. The trial aims to recruit over 3,000 people, and has been designed to be flexible, so new suitable treatments can be added into the trial when these become available.
 +
 +Professor [[:Matthew Snape]], [[:Oxford Vaccine Group]], £0.6 million: With [[:Public Health England]], they will use an existing study of infectious disease immunity in children and teenagers 0 to 19 years old to study the presence of antibodies against COVID-19 (a marker of having had the disease and now having immunity) in approximately 400 children and teenagers per month for the duration of the COVID-19 outbreak, and they will collect information on recent respiratory illnesses and relevant medical history.
 +
 +Professor [[:Trudie Lang]], Nuffield Department of Medicine, £0.3 million: Building on lessons learnt in the [[:Zika]] and [[:Ebola]] outbreaks, the [[:Global Health Network]] will deliver and share trusted research tools, guidance and training, for example providing guidance on how to run studies in local clinics and hospitals. They will work with partners internationally to create lasting research networks to support evidence generation in challenging settings, so that better quality, standardised data is shared faster worldwide.
 +
 +Professor [[:Sally Sheard]], [[:University of Liverpool]], and Dr [[:Nina Gobat]], Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, £0.3 million: Working with colleagues at the University of Oxford, they will analyse the UK pandemic response by collecting real-time responses from senior policymakers and stakeholders (PHE, DHSC, NHS) and the frontline experiences of healthcare workers, and by studying media and document sources. Their findings will inform senior policymakers.
 +
 +Dr [[:Sumana Sanyal]], [[:Sir William Dunn School of Pathology]], £0.2 million: The virus, SARS-CoV-2, uses enzymes within infected cells called proteases (enzymes which cut up other proteins), so it can replicate and spread. This study will identify which proteases are necessary for the virus, to provide targets for future drugs and vaccine development. ((https://web.archive.org/web/20200420230311/https://www.research.ox.ac.uk/Article/2020-04-20-five-oxford-covid-19-projects-receive-ukri-funding))
 +
 +==== Bogus Models for Social Distancing Propaganda ====
 +{{ ::oxford_social_distancing_bogus_math_model.png?600|}}
 +Social distancing works: Here’s the Maths
 +6th Apr 2020 Sarah Whitebloom 
 +
 +Considerable uncertainty surrounds Covid-19 - how long it will take before a vaccine is developed, the death rate amongst cases and even how many cases there have been so far. But there is one thing of which we can be sure: social distancing works, according to a mathematical modelling expert from Oxford University.
 +
 +Dr Robin Thompson, a junior research fellow in [[:mathematical epidemiology]], has crunched the numbers and found [[:social distancing]] can reduce pass-on rates of Covid-19 substantially. His mathematical modelling, based on measures now in place to reduce person-to-person contact, reveals a scenario in which case numbers could be reduced by almost 90%. ((https://web.archive.org/web/20200409090914/https://www.research.ox.ac.uk/Article/2020-04-06-social-distancing-works-here-s-the-maths))
 +{{ ::social_distance_works_oxford.png?800|}}
  
  
Line 30: Line 72:
  
 ==== Misinformation Research Lab ==== ==== Misinformation Research Lab ====
 +
 +
 +=== Initiative on Vaccine Misinformation ===
 +
 +The Challenge
 +
 +Long-held scientific consensus on vital issues such as climate change or the vaccines is increasingly contested, heavily debated on social media and even in the mainstream news media. New technological innovations like artificial intelligence are discussed in terms that veer from the alarmist to the exuberant.
 +
 +Public understanding of key issues in science and technology is often limited and misinformation about basic issues in science and technology - from natural selection to global warming - abounds.
 +
 +How can we better understand public discussions of science and technology, and what can be done to improve them?
 +
 +In this three-year programme researchers from the [[:Oxford Internet Institute]] and the [[:Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism]] are examining the interplay between systematic misinformation campaigns, news coverage, and increasingly important social media platforms for public understanding of science and technological innovation. The programme looks at the problem of “junk science”, “fake news” and public policy issues.
 +
 +
 +Oxford Martin [[:Initiative on Vaccine Misinformation]]. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, Professor [[:Phil Howard]] launched a new related initiative to help counter the spread of misleading health information, particularly around [[:COVID-19 vaccinations]]. 
 +
 +Our aim is to combine social science and computer science to address the damaging impact of computational [[:propaganda]] and other forms of digitally‐enabled misinformation campaigns on scientific innovation, policy making, and public life. We engage with stakeholders in journalism, the technology industry, the scientific community, and among policymakers in the search for evidence-based actionable interventions.((https://web.archive.org/web/20190615061415/https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/misinformation/))
 +
 +=== Political Policy Influence ===
 +[[:Rasmus Kleis Nielsen]], Co-Director of the Oxford Martin Programme on Misinformation, Science and Media and Director of Research at the [[:Reuters Institute]], has joined a [[:European Commission]] High Level Group to advise on initiatives to counter the spread of disinformation online.
 +
 +Professor Nielsen says: “Democratic societies need quality information, and I am glad the European Commission is looking for ways policymakers can help citizens, news media, and technology companies ensure that information is produced, distributed, and used in ways that empower ordinary people to take part in public life.”
 +
 +Nielsen will bring to the group the [[:Reuters Institute]]’s commitment to connecting independent, evidence-based research with the practical problems faced by citizens, professional journalists, media industries, and policymakers around the world. His input will draw on recent work from the institute including their work on audience perspectives on fake news, and how the media environment is changing. He will also draw on forthcoming research from the new Oxford Martin Programme in collaboration with the Oxford Internet Institute.
 +
 +Based on input from academics, technology companies, news media and civil society organisations, the High Level Group will work to contribute to the development of an EU-level strategy to problems of misinformation. ((https://web.archive.org/web/20190615083218/https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/news/2018-ec-initiative/))
 +
 +
Back to top