You are here: Welcome » Matt Pottinger

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Both sides next revision
matt_pottinger [2022/12/16 01:12]
pamela
matt_pottinger [2022/12/16 02:57] (current)
pamela [Early Journalism]
Line 1: Line 1:
 ===== Matt Pottinger ===== ===== Matt Pottinger =====
 {{ ::matt_pottinger_getty_pic_2020.png?400|}} {{ ::matt_pottinger_getty_pic_2020.png?400|}}
 +
 +==== Early Life ====
 +Wikipedia - Matt Pottinger is the son of author and former politician J. [[:Stanley Pottinger]]. He was educated at [[:Milton Academy]] and is a schoolmate and childhood friend of fellow journalist [[:John Avlon]]. Pottinger graduated from the University of Massachusetts Amherst with an undergraduate degree in Chinese studies; he is fluent in Mandarin.
 +
 +He won numerous awards, including multiple [[:Pulitzer Prize]] nominations. He covered a variety of topics, including the [[:SARS]] epidemic and the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami; in the latter assignment, he met United States Marines and was inspired by their courageousness.
 +
 +==== Early Journalism ====
 +
 +=== 2002 Hutchison's Downturn Is Far From Complete ===
 +HONG KONG -- Hutchison Whampoa's stock price has plunged 60% from its peak in early 2000
 +By Matt Pottinger Staff Reporter of The Wall Street Journal
 +Updated Aug. 1, 2002 ((https://web.archive.org/web/20170806220954/https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB1028132333960685160))
 +
 +=== 2004 - A Hidden Cost Of China's Growth: Mercury Migration ===
 +Turning to Coal, Nation Sends Toxic Metal Around Globe; Buildup in the Great Lakes
 +By Matt Pottinger, Steve Stecklow and John J. Fialka Staff Reporters of The [[:Wall Street Journal]]
 +Updated Dec. 17, 2004 ((https://web.archive.org/web/20170806222503/https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB110325317062703084))
 +
 +==== 2005 - Patriot Goes to War ====
 +
 +A young man and his ideals
 +The Hill By Dick Morris - 10/06/05 
 +
 +Matt Pottinger has served as a correspondent for The Wall Street Journal in China for nearly five years. Now, at the age of 32, he is leaving to join the United States Marine Corps.
 +
 +Matt Pottinger has served as a correspondent for The Wall Street Journal in China for nearly five years. Now, at the age of 32, he is leaving to join the United States Marine Corps.
 +
 +His is a story of a patriotism and commitment underscored and emphasized by the lessons he has learned living in one of the most politically repressive societies on the planet. There is so much we can all learn from him about China and about our own country.((https://web.archive.org/web/20170728064312/http://thehill.com/opinion/columnists/dick-morris/4703-a-young-man-and-his-ideals))
 +
 +==== 2010 - Fixing Intel: A Blueprint for Making Intelligence Relevant in Afghanistan ====
 +[[:Center for New American Security]]
 +
 +{{ ::cnas_matt_pottinger_afghan_intel.png?400|}} 
 +**About the Authors**
 +
 +**Major General Michael T. Flynn** has been the Deputy Chief of Staff, Intelligence (CJ2), for the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan since June 2009. his previous assignment was [[:Director of Intelligence]], J-2, for the Joint Staff at the Pentagon. He has three decades of experience as an intelligence officer. he can be reached by email at michael.t.flynn@ afghan.swa.army.mil.
 +
 +**Captain Matt Pottinger** is serving in Kabul as an advisor to Major General Flynn. he was the 2009 winner of the
 +lieutenant Colonel Michael D. Kuszewski Award for **Marine Corps Intelligence officer of the Year**. he can be reached by email at matthew.f.pottinger@afghan.swa.army.mil.
 +
 +Paul D. Batchelor, of the [[:Defense Intelligence Agency]]’s [[:Senior Executive Service]], is currently serving at ISAF headquarters as **Senior Advisor for Civilian/Military Integration**. He has served as the DIA’s advisor to the
 +Secretary of Defense and as manager of current and **crisis intelligence support** to the Chairman of the Joint
 +Chiefs. he can be reached by email at paul.d.batchelor@afghan.swa.army.mil.
 +
 +**Acknowledgements -** The authors would like to thank the staff of the [[:Center for a New American Security]], several anonymous external reviewers and especially liz Fontaine of CNAS for their help with this paper.
 +((https://web.archive.org/web/20100215063118/http://www.cnas.org/files/documents/publications/AfghanIntel_Flynn_Jan2010_code507_voices.pdf))
 +
 +==== 2011 Meet Captain Matt Pottinger, US Marine Corps ====
 +The Atlantic by Peter Osnos -April 5, 2011
 +
 +I cannot do justice to the development of Pottinger's ideas in snippets from several interviews, but fortunately, as he closed out his second Afghan tour, he was **co-author with Flynn and Paul D. Batchelor** of the [[:Defense Intelligence Agency]] of an extensive analysis called "Fixing Intel: A Blueprint for Making Intelligence Relevant in Afghanistan." The unclassified report was eventually released by the [[:Center for a New American Security]], a **Washington think tank**. ((https://web.archive.org/web/20110409205745/https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/04/meet-captain-matt-pottinger-united-states-marine-corps/236825/))
  
 ==== Pottinger Evolves from Intelligence to Policy ==== ==== Pottinger Evolves from Intelligence to Policy ====
  
 Matthew Pottinger: Architect of the Chinese Cold War? Matthew Pottinger: Architect of the Chinese Cold War?
-by Michael B. Cerny October 2, 2019+ 
 +by Michael B. Cerny  
 + 
 +October 2, 2019
  
  
Line 388: Line 442:
 The following is the English language version of a speech that was delivered by Deputy National Security Advisor Matt Pottinger in Mandarin Chinese.((https://web.archive.org/web/20200518081819/https://hk.usconsulate.gov/n-2020050401/)) The following is the English language version of a speech that was delivered by Deputy National Security Advisor Matt Pottinger in Mandarin Chinese.((https://web.archive.org/web/20200518081819/https://hk.usconsulate.gov/n-2020050401/))
  
- +==== AEI Interview - Cold War Posture with Russia & China ==== 
 + 
 +American Enterprise Institute AEI is grandfather of NeoCon think tanks.. 
 + 
 +AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE | 1789 Massachusetts Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20036 | 202.862.5800 | aei.org 
 + 
 +{{ ::matt_aei_really_sick_not_covid.png?800|}} 
 + 
 +Matt Pottinger: Thanks for having me. It's great to see you both. 
 + 
 +Marc Thiessen: We were all together at the AEI World Forum recently, which is an off-the-record event, and you were kind enough to speak in the plenary. And you had some fascinating comments, and you kindly agreed to come on the podcast and share them with our listeners. So, let me just start here by asking you where we are right now in what you described as the start of a new Cold War. 
 + 
 + 
 +Matt Pottinger: Yeah. So, this term Cold War is, for some people, contentious. It's interesting. There are, a lot of people understandably, have wanted to avoid admitting that we're really in some kind of a Cold War construct, again, except with the roles of Russia and China reversed, right? With China really as sort of the giant power, and the Russians in the junior partner role.  
 + 
 +But a Cold War is, it's a long-term strategic competition, right? It a competition between nuclear-armed great powers for whom military power is extremely important. And of course, there's a risk of a head-on confrontation militarily between the nuclear-armed great powers, but both sides in the first Cold War, as in the second, have an interest in trying to constrain the competition to non-military decisive means, so really competing in terms of technology and economic might, ideological and informational power. 
 + 
 +pdf page 8  
 + 
 +Matt Pottinger - Why not just aim to win? I would be doing a couple of things. One, is that even as we rush munitions and supplies to Ukraine, and I think we should be doing everything possible to facilitate that the arsenals of other NATO members get front- loaded into this fight, right, we should be doing the same thing with, for Taiwan right now.  
 + 
 +We've seen, there was a rumor of a [[:KGB]] leak or an [[:FSB]] rather, leak that Beijing had, that they believe 
 +that Beijing was going to move on Taiwan later this year, which is conceivable. It is conceivable. So, we're already in the window of danger for Taiwan. So, **why not ensure that we are cranking out munitions**, so that we show that we are able, that Taiwan is able, just as we want to show and demonstrate that our European friends are able to sustain a long-term costly fight if, for Putin and for Xi Jinping alike, if she takes such a big step as 
 +invading Taiwan. 
 + 
 +Danielle Pletka: Matt, you make me very nervous. Listening to you describe this, what Xi Jinping is talking about is by no standard a Cold War, and by no standard an offer to allow us more time with which to bolster our own defenses, potentially undermine his, to decouple economically, and to somehow undermine the Chinese economy.  
 + 
 +What it sounds like we're faced with is an admittedly, not terribly competent, but nonetheless, very dangerous leader in Russia. We don't know how competent the Chinese military is, but those are very, very dangerous speeches. None of this sounds like Cold War to me. Am I misreading? Is he just being bellicose for another purpose? 
 + 
 + 
 +Matt Pottinger: Well, I think he's gearing up to invade Taiwan. I do. I think that we're in that wind of danger now, and that he is someone who talks a lot about taking decisive steps and not waiting. So, he's someone who is very patient when it came to building his own power. 
 + 
 +He's very patient in cultivating the relationships he needed to cultivate, to ultimately climb the ladder to the pinnacle of power in China. He's not in a patient mode anymore. That's, the patient time is now passed, if we were to believe what he's saying, when he's speaking in his own language to his own party leadership. So, what that tells me is that we need our business leaders to pay very, very close attention to the possibility that we are going to be in a head-on conflict or in a series of proxy fights, proxy wars, launched, not by us. 
 + 
 +Matt Pottinger:  
 + 
 +Remember, we didn't, just like the first Cold War, we didn't pick this one. We didn't start it, okay? This was started by Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin and some of their supporting role players like the Ayatollah, to a lesser extent, Kim Jong-un in Korea. But, we are now facing an actual war in Europe that is being underwritten by Xi Jinping and prosecuted by Vladimir Putin.  
 + 
 +If that's not a wake-up call to Volkswagen to start coming up with a new business model that doesn't rely entirely on the Chinese market, or Apple, if that doesn't wake up Apple to start finding alternatives to its supply chain, besides China, then those companies are going to go the way of the dodo, eventually.((https://web.archive.org/web/20221215231246/https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/FINAL-Pottinger-Transcript-3.23.22.pdf)) 
 + 
 +==== Linked In Profile ==== 
 +((https://web.archive.org/web/20221216005445/https://www.finnotes.org/people/matt-pottinger))
Back to top