You are here: Welcome » Project DEFUSE

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides next revision
defuse [2022/09/29 16:26]
pamela created		defuse [2022/09/29 16:42] (current)
pamela
Line 1: Line 1:
 ===== Project DEFUSE ===== ===== Project DEFUSE =====
 {{ ::defuse_proposal_cover.png?400|}} {{ ::defuse_proposal_cover.png?400|}}
 +
 +In order to get the 3 inserts of Gp-120 to exist in SARS-Cov-2, the genomic sequences that coded for them had to have got there by recombination from another organism or in a lab. Because they don’t exist anywhere in nature it is not possible to have come from another organism. Ecohealth's proposal in 2018 perfectly described those inserts. 
 +
 +Aspect #1: The function of these inserts - that didn’t exist before 2019 in any coronavirus - were clearly stated as the intention of the DARPA DEFUSE proposal
 +
 +In case you haven’t seen it, this is the document (archived here). You can see the involved players - Peter Daszak and Ecohealth Alliance. 
 +
 +This means that the Ecohealth proposal in 2018 described exactly the two changes made to existing SARS-coronaviruses that resulted in SARS-CoV-2 in 2019. Billions of years of random evolutionary change (that could never have been possible because there were no humans living in the bat cave for the evolutionary changes to promulgate) happened in 1 year. Then the authors of the proposal and all of their connected chums went into overdrive to dispel any talk of what you can now see is completely obvious. (If you haven’t seen Chris Martenson’s excellent review of the people involved and their nefarious meeting you should). ((https://arkmedic.substack.com/p/absolute-proof-the-gp-120-sequences))
  
 ==== DRASTIC DEFUSE Document Archive & Analysis ==== ==== DRASTIC DEFUSE Document Archive & Analysis ====
 Note: DRASTIC produced its analysis of the documents, which can be found here: https://drasticresearch.org/2021/09/20/1583/  ((https://web.archive.org/web/20220416173818/https://drasticresearch.org/2021/09/21/the-defuse-project-documents/)) Note: DRASTIC produced its analysis of the documents, which can be found here: https://drasticresearch.org/2021/09/20/1583/  ((https://web.archive.org/web/20220416173818/https://drasticresearch.org/2021/09/21/the-defuse-project-documents/))
 +
 +
 +==== Part V: The Myth of the Blind Watchmaker - Gaslight of the Gods ====
 +Charles Rixey, MA, MBA
 +
 +The intensity of the campaign to smother the lab-leak hypothesis for COVID-19 has always seemed out of proportion to the evidence that points to either possibility, but the strength of the assertions from the global experts on coronavirology & microbiology quickly established the appearance of an authoritative consensus. The majority of my research has been focused on compiling and laying out the evidence that shows how Anthony Fauci & others manufactured that consensus, and used censorship to prevent the public from learning of their activities. ((https://prometheusshrugged.substack.com/p/theblindwatchmaker))
Back to top