Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
bioweapons [2022/10/06 19:03] pamela [Bioweapons] | bioweapons [2022/12/07 00:38] (current) pamela [Pandemic Profiteers] | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
“The report of the Gruinard experiment indicated that [[: | “The report of the Gruinard experiment indicated that [[: | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Gruinard Island Decontamination Cleanup === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Nature. 1983 May 19-25; | ||
+ | |||
+ | Decontamination of Bacillus anthracis on Gruinard Island? | ||
+ | R J Manchee, M G Broster, I S Anderson, R M Henstridge, J Melling | ||
+ | PMID: 6405284 DOI: 10.1038/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Abstract | ||
+ | |||
+ | In experiments on Gruinard Island 40 years ago small bombs containing spores of Bacillus anthracis were suspended from a gantry and detonated, producing widespread contamination of the island' | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Anthrax Island 2022 Fires === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Gruinard Island: Fire on island used for Anthrax experiments | ||
+ | |||
+ | BBC March 27, 2022 | ||
+ | |||
+ | An uninhabited Scottish island where government scientists once conducted experiments with Anthrax has been hit by a fire. People who saw the fire on Gruinard Island from the mainland described the scene as " | ||
+ | |||
+ | The island was used for germ warfare experiments during World War Two. In 1986, Gruinard was again a hive of activity as teams of scientists, vaccinated against anthrax and dressed in protective clothing, prepared to return the island to its natural state. | ||
+ | |||
+ | They sprayed the soil with seawater and [[: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Finally, on 24 April 1990, the MoD declared Gruinard anthrax free. ((https:// | ||
===== U.S. Bioweapons Programs ===== | ===== U.S. Bioweapons Programs ===== | ||
Line 32: | Line 58: | ||
By The Exposé on April 22, 2022 | By The Exposé on April 22, 2022 | ||
- | The Defense Threat Reduction Agency | + | The Defense Threat Reduction Agency |
- | The recent scandal over the involvement of Hunter Biden in bioweapons research brought these companies to the forefront of public opinion. These companies not only have a poor track record, but are also directly involved in the development of bioweapons, posing a significant and growing threat to national and international security. | + | The recent scandal over the involvement of [[:Hunter Biden]] in bioweapons research brought these companies to the forefront of public opinion. These companies not only have a poor track record, but are also directly involved in the development of [[:bioweapons]], posing a significant and growing threat to national and international security. |
[[: | [[: | ||
- | San Francisco-based Metabiota was tapped by the Sierra Leonean government and the World Health Organization to help monitor the spread of virus and support the response after Ebola was discovered circulating in Africa in March 2014. The company’s failure to track samples and have absolutely no control on what was being done made an already chaotic situation worse. | + | San Francisco-based Metabiota was tapped by the Sierra Leonean government and the [[:World Health Organization]] to help monitor the spread of virus and support the response after Ebola was discovered circulating in Africa in March 2014. The company’s failure to track samples and have absolutely no control on what was being done made an already chaotic situation worse. |
WHO experts have criticised the company. In Sierra Leone, Sylvia Blyden, who served as special executive assistant to the country’s president in the early days of the outbreak, said Metabiota’s response was a disaster.(more) | WHO experts have criticised the company. In Sierra Leone, Sylvia Blyden, who served as special executive assistant to the country’s president in the early days of the outbreak, said Metabiota’s response was a disaster.(more) | ||
Line 44: | Line 70: | ||
[[: | [[: | ||
- | A letter from the Kherson department of the Ukrainian Security Service said that DTRA and Black& | + | A letter from the Kherson department of the [[:Ukrainian Security Service]] said that [[:DTRA]] and [[:Black& |
The company was involved in human experimentation and conducts research on bioweapons. | The company was involved in human experimentation and conducts research on bioweapons. | ||
Line 50: | Line 76: | ||
Black& | Black& | ||
- | In addition, Black& | + | In addition, Black& |
- | Black& | + | Black& |
[[:CH2M Hill]] was involved in bioweapons research | [[:CH2M Hill]] was involved in bioweapons research | ||
- | The Defense Threat Reduction Agency funded CH2M Hill to stockpile dangerous biological agents, such as anthrax and schistosoma haematobiom at the Lugar Research Center and employed former Georgian bio warfare scientists to work on biological weapons development projects. | + | The Defense Threat Reduction Agency |
- | Seventy-three volunteers died while testing new deadly toxins. In 2017 CH2M Hill conducted the KZ-33 project with the [[:Research Institute for Biosafety Issues of Kazakhstan]] and [[:Duke-NUS Medical School]] funded by The Defense Threat Reduction Agency, which aimed to study bat coronaviruses. | + | **Seventy-three volunteers died while testing new deadly toxins.** In 2017 CH2M Hill conducted the KZ-33 project with the [[:Research Institute for Biosafety Issues of Kazakhstan]] and [[:Duke-NUS Medical School]] funded by The Defense Threat Reduction Agency, which aimed to study bat coronaviruses. |
Line 67: | Line 93: | ||
Battelle Memorial Institute has already worked on the Bio-weapons Program under 11 previous contracts with the US Army(1952-1966). | Battelle Memorial Institute has already worked on the Bio-weapons Program under 11 previous contracts with the US Army(1952-1966). | ||
- | Project Clear Vision 1997 and 2000, a joint investigation by the CIA and the Battelle Memorial Institute, under a contract awarded by the Agency, reconstructed and tested a Soviet-era anthrax bombl in order to test its dissemination characteristics. | + | [[:Project Clear Vision]] 1997 and 2000, a joint investigation by the [[:CIA]] and the [[:Battelle Memorial Institute]], under a contract awarded by the Agency, reconstructed and tested a Soviet-era anthrax bombl in order to test its dissemination characteristics. |
Since 2006 Battelle has operated a Top Secret Bio Laboratory NBACC at Fort Detrick, Maryland under a US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) contract. Battelle funds NBACC to store and research deadly pathogens such as Ebola, nerve agent and anthrax and conducted secret human experiments. | Since 2006 Battelle has operated a Top Secret Bio Laboratory NBACC at Fort Detrick, Maryland under a US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) contract. Battelle funds NBACC to store and research deadly pathogens such as Ebola, nerve agent and anthrax and conducted secret human experiments. | ||
Line 74: | Line 100: | ||
Melioidosis is biological weapon agent. There is strong evidence of U.S. research into bioweapons through contractors, | Melioidosis is biological weapon agent. There is strong evidence of U.S. research into bioweapons through contractors, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Spartacus ICENI Biolab History ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Substack October 27, 2022 - Actual Scientific Meme Content | ||
+ | |||
+ | In 2009, [[:USAID]] started the EPT-[[: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Ever since 2001 and Amerithrax, | ||
+ | |||
+ | This was covered extensively by [[:Whitney Webb]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === All Roads Lead to Dark Winter === | ||
+ | |||
+ | In late June 2001, the U.S. military was preparing for a “Dark Winter.” At Andrews Air Force Base in Camp Springs, Maryland, several Congressmen, | ||
+ | |||
+ | The simulation was a collaborative effort led by the John Hopkins [[:Center for Civilian Biodefense Strategies (part of the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security) in collaboration with the Center for Strategic and International Studies]] (CSIS), the Analytic Services ([[: | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[:Edward Hammond]] and his watchdog group, the [[:Sunshine Project]], and other investigators, | ||
+ | |||
+ | The US DOD’s cavalier response to all of this, instead of bringing oversight and accountability to risky biological research conducted in the US, was to outsource the research to foreign biolabs with no oversight, and fund it through an array of contractors and NGOs, like [[: | ||
+ | |||
+ | The secretive and suspicious nature of the American [[: | ||
+ | |||