You are here: Welcome » Anthony Fauci

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Both sides next revision
anthony_fauci [2022/04/04 02:20]
pamela [Research with Former Soviet Countries]
anthony_fauci [2023/03/20 15:26] (current)
jane [Crazy Shit Anthony Fauci Did or Said]
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== Anthony S. Fauci M.D. ======+====== Anthony Fauci ======
  
-Dr. **Anthony Stephen Fauci** was born in Brooklyn's Dyker Heights neighborhood on December 24, 1940. Fauci’s father Steve ran a pharmacy, and the family lived in the apartment above. His mother Eugenia and sister Denise worked in the store, and young Tony would make drug deliveries on his bicycle. He attended Regis High School, a Jesuit School on Manhattan’s Upper East Side. +{{ ::time-100-anthony-fauci.jpeg?200|}} 
 + 
 +Dr. **Anthony Stephen Fauci**, MD was born in Brooklyn's Dyker Heights neighborhood on December 24, 1940. Fauci’s father Steve ran a pharmacy, and the family lived in the apartment above. His mother Eugenia and sister Denise worked in the store, and young Tony would make drug deliveries on his bicycle. He attended Regis High School, a Jesuit School on Manhattan’s Upper East Side. 
  
 After completing his residency at [[:Cornell Medical Center]], Dr. Fauci joined the [[:NIH]] in 1966, as part of an intramural research program known as the “Yellow Berets.”((https://irp.nih.gov/catalyst/v29i2/from-the-annals-of-nih-history)) In 1970, he left for a year and a half to serve as Chief Resident at the New York Hospital [[Cornell]] Medical Center. In 1971, he returned to [[NIH]] as Senior Investigator in the Laboratory of Clinical Investigation.  After completing his residency at [[:Cornell Medical Center]], Dr. Fauci joined the [[:NIH]] in 1966, as part of an intramural research program known as the “Yellow Berets.”((https://irp.nih.gov/catalyst/v29i2/from-the-annals-of-nih-history)) In 1970, he left for a year and a half to serve as Chief Resident at the New York Hospital [[Cornell]] Medical Center. In 1971, he returned to [[NIH]] as Senior Investigator in the Laboratory of Clinical Investigation. 
Line 70: Line 72:
 In 2014, in the wake of serious safety lapses at U.S. labs, including 75 CDC researchers being exposed to anthrax, and the chance discovery of 16 misplaced small pox vials at another facility, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) and Department of Health and Human Services declared a moratorium on funding for gain-of-function research for influenza, SARS and MERS. Gain-of-function research involves the manipulation of viruses and other pathogens in order to enhance their capabilities. The 2014 moratorium followed an earlier year-long moratorium on H5N1 research that was instituted in 2012 after researchers had enabled airborne transmission of avian influenza virus H5N1 between ferrets. In addition to the dangers posed by H5N1 research, and the recent safety lapses at U.S. labs, the moratorium was prompted by the potential dangers associated with gain-of-function research on particularly deadly viruses like SARS and MERS.((//U.S. Government [[:Gain-of-Function]] Deliberative Process and Research Funding Pause on Selected Gain-of-Function Research Involving Influenza, MERS, and SARS Viruses//, October 17, 2014. https://web.archive.org/web/20190726151418/https://www.phe.gov/s3/dualuse/documents/gain-of-function.pdf))((Jef Akst, "Moratorium on Gain-of-Function Research," //The Scientist//, October 21, 2019. https://www.the-scientist.com/the-nutshell/moratorium-on-gain-of-function-research-36564; https://web.archive.org/web/20190726122011/https://www.the-scientist.com/the-nutshell/moratorium-on-gain-of-function-research-36564)) In 2014, in the wake of serious safety lapses at U.S. labs, including 75 CDC researchers being exposed to anthrax, and the chance discovery of 16 misplaced small pox vials at another facility, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) and Department of Health and Human Services declared a moratorium on funding for gain-of-function research for influenza, SARS and MERS. Gain-of-function research involves the manipulation of viruses and other pathogens in order to enhance their capabilities. The 2014 moratorium followed an earlier year-long moratorium on H5N1 research that was instituted in 2012 after researchers had enabled airborne transmission of avian influenza virus H5N1 between ferrets. In addition to the dangers posed by H5N1 research, and the recent safety lapses at U.S. labs, the moratorium was prompted by the potential dangers associated with gain-of-function research on particularly deadly viruses like SARS and MERS.((//U.S. Government [[:Gain-of-Function]] Deliberative Process and Research Funding Pause on Selected Gain-of-Function Research Involving Influenza, MERS, and SARS Viruses//, October 17, 2014. https://web.archive.org/web/20190726151418/https://www.phe.gov/s3/dualuse/documents/gain-of-function.pdf))((Jef Akst, "Moratorium on Gain-of-Function Research," //The Scientist//, October 21, 2019. https://www.the-scientist.com/the-nutshell/moratorium-on-gain-of-function-research-36564; https://web.archive.org/web/20190726122011/https://www.the-scientist.com/the-nutshell/moratorium-on-gain-of-function-research-36564))
  
-On December 19, 2017, the NIH lifted the funding pause on gain-of-function research related to influenza, SARS and MERS.((Francis Collins (NIH Director), "NIH Lifts Funding Pause on Gain-of-Function Research," December 19, 2017. https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/who-we-are/nih-director/statements/nih-lifts-funding-pause-gain-function-research; https://web.archive.org/web/20171222223351/https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/who-we-are/nih-director/statements/nih-lifts-funding-pause-gain-function-research)) As the pause was lifted, the Department of Health and Human Services issued a new set of guidelines for funding gain-of-function research, entitled "Framework for +On December 19, 2017, the NIH lifted the funding pause on gain-of-function research related to influenza, SARS and MERS.((Francis Collins (NIH Director), "NIH Lifts Funding Pause on Gain-of-Function Research," December 19, 2017. https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/who-we-are/nih-director/statements/nih-lifts-funding-pause-gain-function-research; https://web.archive.org/web/20171222223351/https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/who-we-are/nih-director/statements/nih-lifts-funding-pause-gain-function-research)) As the pause was lifted, the Department of Health and Human Services issued a new set of guidelines for funding gain-of-function research, entitled "Framework for Guiding Funding Decisions about Proposed Research Involving Enhanced Potential Pandemic Pathogens."((U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, "Framework for Guiding Funding Decisions about Proposed Research Involving Enhanced Potential Pandemic Pathogens," December 19, 2017. https://web.archive.org/web/20171224055735/https://www.phe.gov/s3/dualuse/Documents/p3co.pdf)) Notably, this new framework carved out a broad exception for work related to vaccines, even where such work involved Pandemic Potential Pathogens (or "PPPs"):
-Guiding Funding Decisions about Proposed Research Involving Enhanced Potential Pandemic Pathogens."((U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, "Framework for Guiding Funding Decisions about Proposed Research Involving Enhanced Potential Pandemic Pathogens," December 19, 2017. https://web.archive.org/web/20171224055735/https://www.phe.gov/s3/dualuse/Documents/p3co.pdf)) Notably, this new framework carved out a broad exception for work related to vaccines, even where such work involved Pandemic Potential Pathogens (or "PPPs"):+
  
 >"To the extent that transmissibility and/or virulence of PPPs are modified in the following categories of studies, the resulting pathogens are not considered to be enhanced PPPs for the purposes of this Framework: >"To the extent that transmissibility and/or virulence of PPPs are modified in the following categories of studies, the resulting pathogens are not considered to be enhanced PPPs for the purposes of this Framework:
Line 114: Line 115:
 >Most of us would like ‘America’s Doctor’ to properly diagnose our illnesses using the best science, and then instruct us on how to get healthy. What if, instead of spending their entire budgets developing profitable pharmaceutical products, Dr. Fauci and the heads of other NIH institutes deployed researchers to explore the links between glyphosate in food and the explosion of gluten allergies, the link between pesticide residues and the epidemic of neurological diseases and cancers, the causal connections between aluminum and Alzheimer's disease, between mercury from coal plants and escalating autism rates, and the association of airborne particulates with the asthma epidemic? What if NIH financed research to explore the association between childhood vaccines and the explosion of juvenile diabetes, asthma, and rheumatoid arthritis, and the links between aluminum vaccine adjuvants and the epidemics of food allergies and allergic rhinitis? …. >Most of us would like ‘America’s Doctor’ to properly diagnose our illnesses using the best science, and then instruct us on how to get healthy. What if, instead of spending their entire budgets developing profitable pharmaceutical products, Dr. Fauci and the heads of other NIH institutes deployed researchers to explore the links between glyphosate in food and the explosion of gluten allergies, the link between pesticide residues and the epidemic of neurological diseases and cancers, the causal connections between aluminum and Alzheimer's disease, between mercury from coal plants and escalating autism rates, and the association of airborne particulates with the asthma epidemic? What if NIH financed research to explore the association between childhood vaccines and the explosion of juvenile diabetes, asthma, and rheumatoid arthritis, and the links between aluminum vaccine adjuvants and the epidemics of food allergies and allergic rhinitis? ….
  
-Robert F Kennedy Jr. - The Real Anthony Fauci+Robert F Kennedy Jr. - The Real Anthony Fauci((https://web.archive.org/web/20220112013505/https://resistir.info/livros/kennedy_the_real_anthony_fauci.pdf))
  
  
-===== Crazy Shit Anthony Fauci Did or Said =====+==== Crazy Shit Anthony Fauci Did or Said ====
 Oh, this is going to get fun. It'll make you cry, but it'll make you laugh, too. Oh, this is going to get fun. It'll make you cry, but it'll make you laugh, too.
  
Line 133: Line 134:
  
 {{ :fauci_dec_2009.mp4 |}} {{ :fauci_dec_2009.mp4 |}}
 +
 +//Italic Text//
 +
 +November 12, 2021: " ... I mean, if you got attacked by the crazy press, far-right press the way I have, you would feel as sensitive as I do... when you have unvaccinated grandchildren, the best way to protect unvaccinated grandchildren is to surround them with vaccinated people ...Who are very unlikely to spread it to them" ((https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/12/podcasts/the-daily/anthony-fauci-vaccine-mandates-booster-shots.html?showTranscript=1))
  
 November 28,2021: "I represent science."((https://youtu.be/DzTvQ7HyW6I?t=3465)) November 28,2021: "I represent science."((https://youtu.be/DzTvQ7HyW6I?t=3465))
Line 160: Line 165:
 A booster dose increases protection against symptomatic disease to 75%, Fauci said.((https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/15/fauci-says-covid-boosters-work-against-omicron-no-need-for-variant-specific-third-shot-.html)) A booster dose increases protection against symptomatic disease to 75%, Fauci said.((https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/15/fauci-says-covid-boosters-work-against-omicron-no-need-for-variant-specific-third-shot-.html))
  
 +April, 2022 - Fauci: "In my wildest dreams I could not imagine becoming a polarizing figure."((April 21, 2022 | Emma Woodhouse via Kasie Hunt | [[:Twitter]] | [[https://twitter.com/EWoodhouse7/status/1517275303512522753?t=-euk6LZPKea4NhxIHDOJ4Q&s=03|Tweet]]))
  
 +March 13, 2023: On CNN in an interview by Jim Acosta Fauci continued to promote a natural occurrence of the SARS-COV-2 virus (jumping from an animal to man) while saying " ... I will keep a completely open mind"  and " ... all of the intelligence agencies agree unanimously that this was not engineered ..."  he also posits " ... a lab leak could be someone was out in the wild, maybe looking for different types of viruses in bats, got infected, went into a lab and was being studied in the lab and then came out of the lab but if that's the definition of a lab leak, Jum, then that still a natural occurrence ..." ((https://www.cnn.com/videos/health/2023/03/11/fauci-responds-to-covid-lab-leak-theory-acostanr-vpx.cnn))  NB: this ought to convince a discerning listerner that Dr. Fauci is a politician, not a scientist.
 ==== Strange Coincidences ==== ==== Strange Coincidences ====
  
Line 188: Line 195:
 “Professor Anthony Fauci introduced his colleagues to the main directions and achievements of NIAID / NIH's scientific and clinical activities. He praised the results of the cooperation between the institutions and the achievements of the Center in the field of HIV / AIDS and Viral Hepatitis. ((https://web.archive.org/web/20220130015052/http://gtarchive.georgiatoday.ge/news/21059/Dr.-Anthony-Fauci-Praises-Georgia%E2%80%99s-Experience-against-COVID-19)) “Professor Anthony Fauci introduced his colleagues to the main directions and achievements of NIAID / NIH's scientific and clinical activities. He praised the results of the cooperation between the institutions and the achievements of the Center in the field of HIV / AIDS and Viral Hepatitis. ((https://web.archive.org/web/20220130015052/http://gtarchive.georgiatoday.ge/news/21059/Dr.-Anthony-Fauci-Praises-Georgia%E2%80%99s-Experience-against-COVID-19))
  
 +==== Biological Weapons Programs ====
 +
 +Bioweapons Expert claims US Government funded Bio-labs in Ukraine to make Bio-Weapons for use against Russia
 +By Mercola reprint The Exposé on April 11, 2022
 +
 +[[:Francis Boyle]], Ph.D., a Harvard educated lawyer and [[:bioweapons]] expert with a Ph.D. in political science, was interviewed recently about the Bio-Labs in Ukraine, which Russia claims are engaged in U.S.-funded bioweapons research.
 +
 +For decades, Boyle has advocated against the development and use of bioweapons. In fact, he was the one who called for biowarfare legislation at the [[:Biological Weapons Convention]] of 1972. He then went on to draft the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act, which was passed unanimously by both houses of Congress and signed into law by then-president George Bush Sr. in May 1989.
 +
 +While the U.S. has vehemently denied Russia’s accusations, Boyle says that based on what he’s discovered so far, the labs in Ukraine are all conducting biological warfare research — including ethnic-specific biological weapons — at the behest of the U.S. Pentagon, just as Russian authorities are claiming.
 +
 +“The Pentagon does not do missionary work,” he says. “They kill people, and that’s why they are there.” He also points out that everyone involved is subject to life in prison under the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, which explains the mad scramble to project these labs as something other than what they are.
 +
 +President Reagan put Dr. [[:Anthony Fauci]] in charge of the U.S. biological weapons program, and he’s been at it ever since. “About 95% of this biowarfare death science has been funded by Fauci, the NIAID and the NIH, since about 1984,” Boyle says.
 +
 +In previous interviews, Boyle has stated he believes [[:SARS-CoV-2]] is an engineered bioweapon, and here, he again reviews some of the reasons why. He points out that Shi Zheng-li, the famous bat coronavirus researcher at the [[:Wuhan Institute of Virology]] in China, was trained at the biolab in Galveston, Texas, which is “part of U.S. biological warfare industry.”((https://web.archive.org/web/20220411135533/https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/04/11/us-funded-bioweapons-ukraine-use-against-russia/))
 +
 +
 +==== Ethics Loopholes ====
 +
 +How Fauci and Grady Degraded the Standards of Ethical Requirements for Clinical Research in the US Compared to the Rest of the World
 +
 +In reading Nuremberg, The Belmont Report, and now the Helsinki Declaration, I can say that up to 2020, US had far lower ethical standards for human subjects research than WMA. Now? None. Substack - James Lyons-Weiler - Jul 27, 2022
 +
 +Nuremberg focused primarily on the rights of patients’ protection from harm by doctors performing “human experiments”. Helsinki changed the langued to “clinical research”, but the intention was the same. The Belmont Report was an early draft of a guidance-type document in the US meant to inform professionals of the general expectations of normative standards; it is now only considered a “historic” document.
 +
 +Nuremberg, Helsinki and Belmont carry no legally enforceable language in the US. Instead, Nuremberg and Helsinki were meant to provide international standards by which individual countries could gauge their governance and regulation of clinical, human subjects research. It takes a while, but comparing the Helsinki Code to the US policies in play prior to 2020 (before COVID) shows that US researchers (meaning US-based pharmaceutical companies) wanted to weaken the concept of beneficence - the principle that all involved in a trial should benefit from being part of a clinical trial.
 +
 +Where the US had departed (prior to 2020) from the rest of the countries that backed Helsinki (WMA) and participated in its updates included, according to Kimmelman et al. (2009) included:
 +
 +      * Disclosure of conflict of interest;
 +  * 
 +  *     Public disclosure of study design;
 +  * 
 +  *     Benefit for populations in which research is conducted (beneficence);
 +  * 
 +  *     Reporting of accurate results and publication of negative findings;
 +  * 
 +  *     Access to treatment after research has been conducted, and
 +  * 
 +  *     Restriction of use of placebo in a control group where effective alternative treatment is available.
 +
 +The departure formally came when issues related to HIV clinical trials run in less wealthy countries seemed to depart from Helsinki standards. Rather than work to reconcile differences with Helsinki, US companies, and the US government came up with a different international standard called “[[:Good clinical practice]]” - standards in place in the EU (codified as Directive 2001/20/EC), and the US (enforced as policy by NIH), all backed by Pharma.
 +
 +The most well-known sticking point seems to have been the insistence by countries within which US-based pharmaceutical companies were testing their drugs that, at the end of any clinical trial, patients be given access to the best available standard of care for the condition being studied.
 +
 +But that’s just the topic that people feel comfortable talking about.((https://web.archive.org/web/20220728004837/https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/how-fauci-and-grady-lowered-the-standards))
 +
 +=== The Role of the Virtuous Investigator in Protecting Human Research Subjects ===
 +[[:Christine Grady]] and Anthony S. Fauci 
 +
 +abstract
 +
 +In his famous 1966 New England Journal of Medicine article, Henry Beecher concluded that a critical safeguard for protecting human participants, more reliable than informed consent, was the “presence of an intelligent, informed, conscientious, compassionate, responsible investigator.” This article examines Beecher’s appeal to reliance on the “virtuous” investigator in light of the critical role that investigators play in research ethics and the systems of research protections that have been developed since Beecher’s writing. 
 +
 +It addresses the extent to which **research ethics rely on virtuous investigators**; the meaning of virtuous, as distinct from compliance with the rules and regulations that guide ethical research; the particular virtues that it might be important for investigators to have; and the impact of the existing system of human subjects protections on the virtuous investigator. The virtuous investigator who is motivated to take ethical responsibilities seriously is an essential safeguard for the protection of human research participants and an important complement to the system of oversight protections. However, since the current human subjects protection system does not promote virtue or ethical resourcefulness by investigators, attention to enhancing a culture of professional responsibility might serve to forge a synergy between the protections afforded by the current oversight system and those provided by the virtuous investigator. [End Page 122] 
 +
 +Unfortunately, the current human subjects protections system has had the ironic effect of diminishing explicit reliance on the virtuous investigator and in some cases alienating investigators. Strategies that synergize the regulatory protections with a more rigorous culture of responsibility among investigators could help restore a healthier balance.((https://web.archive.org/web/20180603122920/https://muse.jhu.edu/article/627988))
 +
 +
 +==== NIH Funding Awards RePORT Search ====
 +
 +NIAID funding awards listed by project and recipient.
 +((https://reporter.nih.gov/search/JbRgAtchAUKHOoW2X1vObQ/projects?agencies=NIAID))
 +
 +
 +==== Fauci Retirement =====
 +{{ ::nih_fauci_retires.png?400|}}
 +
 +In August 2022, Fauci announced that he would be retiring from his positions in the federal government at the end of the year. [[Bill Gates]] tweeted "Tony, you were an amazing public servant long before COVID-19 struck – and now you are a hero to millions of people, including me."((Bill Gates [@BillGates]. (2022, August 22). //“Tony, you were an amazing public servant long before COVID-19 struck – and now you are a hero to millions of people, including me.” [Tweet].// Twitter. https://web.archive.org/web/20220827011748/https://twitter.com/BillGates/status/1561850788766314496)) [[united_states_of_america:Kentucky]] Senator [[Rand Paul]] warned Fauci that his retirement would not prevent him from cooperating in what will ostensibly be a “full-throated investigation” into the origins of the [[SARS-CoV-2]] virus and the public health crisis that followed.((Bleau, H. (2022, August 22). //Rand Paul: Fauci’s Retirement Won’t Stop a “Full-Throated Investigation.”// Breitbart. http://archive.today/2022.08.22-190645/https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/08/22/rand-paul-faucis-retirement-wont-stop-a-full-throated-investigation/))
 +
 +I am announcing today that I will be stepping down from the positions of Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and Chief of the NIAID Laboratory of Immunoregulation, as well as the position of Chief Medical Advisor to President Joe Biden. I will be leaving these positions in December of this year to pursue the next chapter of my career.
 +
 +It has been the honor of a lifetime to have led the NIAID, an extraordinary institution, for so many years and through so many scientific and public health challenges. I am very proud of our many accomplishments. I have worked with — and learned from — countless talented and dedicated people in my own laboratory, at NIAID, at NIH and beyond. To them I express my abiding respect and gratitude.
 +
 +Over the past 38 years as NIAID Director, I have had the enormous privilege of serving under and advising seven Presidents of the United States, beginning with President Ronald Reagan, on newly emerging and re-emerging infectious disease threats including HIV/AIDS, West Nile virus, the anthrax attacks, pandemic influenza, various bird influenza threats, Ebola and Zika, among others, and, of course, most recently the COVID-19 pandemic. I am particularly proud to have served as the Chief Medical Advisor to President Joe Biden since the very first day of his administration.
 +
 +While I am moving on from my current positions, I am not retiring. After more than 50 years of government service, I plan to pursue the next phase of my career while I still have so much energy and passion for my field. I want to use what I have learned as NIAID Director to continue to advance science and public health and to inspire and mentor the next generation of scientific leaders as they help prepare the world to face future infectious disease threats.
 +
 +Over the coming months, I will continue to put my full effort, passion and commitment into my current responsibilities, as well as help prepare the Institute for a leadership transition. NIH is served by some of the most talented scientists in the world, and I have no doubt that I am leaving this work in very capable hands.
 +
 +Thanks to the power of science and investments in research and innovation, the world has been able to fight deadly diseases and help save lives around the globe. I am proud to have been part of this important work and look forward to helping to continue to do so in the future. ((https://web.archive.org/web/20220822152931/https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/statement-anthony-s-fauci-md)) {{tag>Pro-narrative_scientists}}
 +
 +==== Pandemic Profits ====
 +{{ ::fauci_pandemic_profits.png?600|}}
 +Dr. Fauci and wife’s wealth ‘skyrocketed’ by $5 million during pandemic: analysis
 +New York Post - By Natalie O'Neill - September 29, 2022 
 +
 +Dr. Anthony Fauci and his wife’s net worth grew by $5 million during the COVID-19 pandemic as thousands of US residents struggled financially, according to a government spending watchdog group.
 +
 +The combined wealth of the 81-year-old retiring director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and his bioethicist wife, Christine Grady, soared from $7.5 million in 2019 to $12.6 million at the end of 2021, according to a report from the non-profit OpenTheBooks.
 +
 +“Despite becoming a figure of controversy, the system has rewarded Dr. Fauci handsomely,” the group’s CEO, Adam Andrzejewski, told Fox News Digital. “While Dr. Fauci has been a government bureaucrat for more than 55 years, his household net worth skyrocketed during the pandemic.”
 +
 +The couple’s wealth boost was due in part to major salary increases, cash awards and royalties, according to the report.
 +
 +“Fauci’s soaring net worth was based on career-end salary spiking, lucrative cash prizes awarded by non-profit organizations around the world and an ever-larger investment portfolio,” Andrzejewski said. ((https://web.archive.org/web/20221002154747/https://nypost.com/2022/09/29/fauci-and-wifes-wealth-skyrocketed-by-5m-during-pandemic-analysis/))
 +
 +On September 14, 2020, Senator [[Rand Paul]] sparred with Fauci telling him that the public will learn where Fauci gets his royalties from.((September 14, 2022 | [[Infowars]] | [[https://www.infowars.com/posts/rand-paul-to-fauci-i-promise-you-the-public-will-learn-where-you-get-your-royalties-from/|Rand Paul to Fauci: ‘I Promise You’ The Public Will Learn ‘Where You Get Your Royalties From’]]))
 +
 +==== Dr. Anthony Fauci Deposition ====
 +{{ ::fauci_deposition_transcript_.png?600|}}
 +Techno Fog December 5, 2022 - The FAUCI Deposition Transcript
 +Contradicts, Lies, and "I Don't Recalls" from the nation's most malignant doctor
 +
 +
 +Today, Missouri Attoney General Eric Schmitt released the transcript of the testimony of Dr. [[:Anthony Fauci]]. As you might recall, Fauci was deposed as part of an ongoing federal lawsuit challenging the Biden Administration’s violations of the [[:First Amendment]] in targeting and suppressing the speech of Americans who challenged the government’s narrative on COVID-19.
 +
 +Here is the Fauci deposition transcript. ((https://web.archive.org/web/20221205200831/https://ago.mo.gov/docs/default-source/press-releases/135885afauci112322_full_redacted.pdf?sfvrsn=35f4a425_2))
  
 +AG Eric Schmitt tweeted "The phrase “I don’t recall” was prominent in Fauci’s deposition. He said it a total of 174 times"
  
 +For example, Fauci couldn’t remember what anyone said on a call discussing whether the virus originated in a lab.
  
 +During that same call, Fauci couldn’t recall whether anyone expressed concern that the lab leak “might discredit scientific funding projects.” He also couldn’t recall whether there was a discussion about a lab leak distracting from the virus response. Fauci did remember, however, that they agreed there needed to be more time to investigate the virus origins - including the lab leak theory.
  
 +What else couldn’t Fauci remember? Whether, early into the pandemic, his confidants raised concerns about social media posts about the origins of COVID-19. 
  
 +Yet Fauci did admit he was concerned about social media posts blaming China for the pandemic. He even admitted the accidental lab leak “certainly is a possibility,” contradicting his prior claims to [[:National Geographic]] where he said the virus “could not have been artificially or deliberately manipulated.” ((https://technofog.substack.com/p/the-fauci-deposition-transcript))
Back to top